From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue before updating nr_hw_queues
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:16:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402dd676-ce8b-6691-03ff-cb80aab38ecf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190404084320.24681-4-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Hi Ming
Why not add percpu_ref_tryget/put pair into run queue and requeue work,
or before queue the work ?
Then freezing queue could really implement to freeze the queue and there will be
no any queue activity after freeze, including run queue and requeue work.
Thanks
Jianchao
On 4/4/19 4:43 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Inside __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), only request queues are frozen
> before updating nr_hw_queues.
>
> However, even though blk_mq_freeze_queue() is returned, there might be
> run queue activity not completed, then use-after-free may be triggered
> on hctx and its fields.
>
> Fix this issue by really quiescing queue via blk_mq_quiesce_queue() and
> blk_sync_queue() for making sure no any run queue activity pending
> before releasing hctx.
>
> Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
> Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
> Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index b512ba0cb359..41c12d9008b7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3224,8 +3224,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> if (nr_hw_queues < 1 || nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
> return;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> + list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> + blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
> + blk_sync_queue(q);
> + }
> /*
> * Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
> */
> @@ -3269,8 +3272,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> blk_mq_elv_switch_back(&head, q);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> + list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
> + }
> }
>
> void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 8:43 [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 1/7] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-04 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 20:45 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-05 9:26 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-04-05 13:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 2/7] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 3/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue before updating nr_hw_queues Ming Lei
2019-04-04 15:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 20:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-08 3:16 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2019-04-08 9:01 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 4/7] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 5/7] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 6/7] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 7/7] SCSI: don't hold device refcount in IO path Ming Lei
2019-04-04 17:14 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402dd676-ce8b-6691-03ff-cb80aab38ecf@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox