From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, bvanassche@acm.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] nvme: add support weighted round robin queue
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:21:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624202110.GD6526@minwooim-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e3b0f511a291dd0ce570a6cc5393e10d4509d0e.1561385989.git.zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
> @@ -2627,7 +2752,30 @@ static int nvme_pci_get_address(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, char *buf, int size)
>
> static void nvme_pci_get_ams(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 *ams)
> {
> - *ams = NVME_CC_AMS_RR;
> + /* if deivce doesn't support WRR, force reset wrr queues to 0 */
> + if (!NVME_CAP_AMS_WRRU(ctrl->cap)) {
> + wrr_low_queues = 0;
> + wrr_medium_queues = 0;
> + wrr_high_queues = 0;
> + wrr_urgent_queues = 0;
Could we avoid this kind of reset variables in get_XXX() function? I
guess it would be great if it just tries to get some value which is
mainly focused to do.
> +
> + *ams = NVME_CC_AMS_RR;
> + ctrl->wrr_enabled = false;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * if device support WRR, check wrr queue count, all wrr queues are
> + * 0, don't enable device's WRR.
> + */
> + if ((wrr_low_queues + wrr_medium_queues + wrr_high_queues +
> + wrr_urgent_queues) > 0) {
> + *ams = NVME_CC_AMS_WRRU;
> + ctrl->wrr_enabled = true;
> + } else {
> + *ams = NVME_CC_AMS_RR;
> + ctrl->wrr_enabled = false;
These two line can be merged into above condition:
if (!NVME_CAP_AMS_WRRU(ctrl->cap) ||
wrr_low_queues + wrr_medium_queues + wrr_high_queues +
wrr_urgent_queues <= 0) {
*ams = NVME_CC_AMS_RR;
ctrl->wrr_enabled = false;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1561385989.git.zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
2019-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] block: add weighted round robin for blkcgroup Weiping Zhang
2019-07-18 13:59 ` Tejun Heo
2019-07-23 14:29 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] nvme: add get_ams for nvme_ctrl_ops Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:12 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-25 14:46 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-pci: rename module parameter write_queues to read_queues Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:04 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-25 14:48 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-26 20:27 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] genirq/affinity: allow driver's discontigous affinity set Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-25 2:14 ` Ming Lei
2019-06-25 6:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-25 14:55 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] nvme: add support weighted round robin queue Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:21 ` Minwoo Im [this message]
2019-06-25 15:06 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-27 10:37 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-27 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 15:57 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-07-10 14:20 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-07-29 10:22 ` Weiping Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624202110.GD6526@minwooim-desktop \
--to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangweiping@didiglobal.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox