From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Weiping Zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>
Cc: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
keith.busch@intel.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-pci: rename module parameter write_queues to read_queues
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 05:27:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626202706.GC4934@minwooim-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA70yB5arvfaUsktN-cvd0yHpRi+FwFjL4r5_jTRWM8+rBVdnA@mail.gmail.com>
On 19-06-25 22:48:57, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com> 于2019年6月25日周二 上午6:00写道:
> >
> > On 19-06-24 22:29:19, Weiping Zhang wrote:
> > > Now nvme support three type hardware queues, read, poll and default,
> > > this patch rename write_queues to read_queues to set the number of
> > > read queues more explicitly. This patch alos is prepared for nvme
> > > support WRR(weighted round robin) that we can get the number of
> > > each queue type easily.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Weiping Zhang <zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
> >
> > Hello, Weiping.
> >
> > Thanks for making this patch as a separated one. Actually I'd like to
> > hear about if the origin purpose of this param can be changed or not.
> >
> > I can see a log from Jens when it gets added her:
> > Commit 3b6592f70ad7("nvme: utilize two queue maps, one for reads and
> > one for writes")
> > It says:
> > """
> > NVMe does round-robin between queues by default, which means that
> > sharing a queue map for both reads and writes can be problematic
> > in terms of read servicing. It's much easier to flood the queue
> > with writes and reduce the read servicing.
> > """
> >
> > So, I'd like to hear what other people think about this patch :)
> >
>
> This patch does not change its original behavior, if we set read_queue
> greater than 0, the read and write request will use different tagset map,
> so they will use different hardware queue.
Yes, that's why I want to hear some comments for this change from other
people. I'm not against this change, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1561385989.git.zhangweiping@didiglobal.com>
2019-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] block: add weighted round robin for blkcgroup Weiping Zhang
2019-07-18 13:59 ` Tejun Heo
2019-07-23 14:29 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] nvme: add get_ams for nvme_ctrl_ops Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:12 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-25 14:46 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] nvme-pci: rename module parameter write_queues to read_queues Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:04 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-25 14:48 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-26 20:27 ` Minwoo Im [this message]
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] genirq/affinity: allow driver's discontigous affinity set Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-25 2:14 ` Ming Lei
2019-06-25 6:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-25 14:55 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] nvme: add support weighted round robin queue Weiping Zhang
2019-06-24 20:21 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-25 15:06 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-06-27 10:37 ` Minwoo Im
2019-06-27 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 15:57 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-07-10 14:20 ` Weiping Zhang
2019-07-29 10:22 ` Weiping Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626202706.GC4934@minwooim-desktop \
--to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangweiping@didiglobal.com \
--cc=zwp10758@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox