* [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning
@ 2022-07-16 9:53 Ming Lei
2022-07-16 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-18 12:10 ` Ziyang Zhang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-07-16 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, Ming Lei, kernel test robot
After applying -Wmaybe-uninitialized manually, two build warnings are
triggered:
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:940:11: warning: ‘io’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
940 | io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: In function ‘ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd’:
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:1531:9: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Fix the 1st one by removing 'io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;' which
isn't needed since the function always return successfully after setting
this flag.
Fix the 2nd one by always initializing 'ret'.
Also fix another sparse warning of 'sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return
expression' by changing return type of ublk_setup_iod().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f10c4319dc1f..2c1b01d7f27d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req)
return flags;
}
-static int ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
+static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
{
struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod = ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag);
struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[req->tag];
@@ -937,7 +937,6 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
return -EIOCBQUEUED;
out:
- io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, ret, 0);
pr_devel("%s: complete: cmd op %d, tag %d ret %x io_flags %x\n",
__func__, cmd_op, tag, ret, io->flags);
@@ -1299,13 +1298,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_get_queue_affinity(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
struct ublk_device *ub;
unsigned long queue;
unsigned int retlen;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
if (!ub)
goto out;
- ret = -EINVAL;
queue = header->data[0];
if (queue >= ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues)
goto out;
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning
2022-07-16 9:53 [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning Ming Lei
@ 2022-07-16 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-18 12:10 ` Ziyang Zhang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-07-16 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ming.lei; +Cc: lkp, linux-block
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:53:44 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> After applying -Wmaybe-uninitialized manually, two build warnings are
> triggered:
>
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:940:11: warning: ‘io’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 940 | io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
>
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: In function ‘ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd’:
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:1531:9: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning
commit: f2450f8a2c1ec3e88d6674f747b913aa5f21fa59
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning
2022-07-16 9:53 [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning Ming Lei
2022-07-16 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-07-18 12:10 ` Ziyang Zhang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ziyang Zhang @ 2022-07-18 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei; +Cc: linux-block, Jens Axboe, Xiaoguang Wang
On 2022/7/16 17:53, Ming Lei wrote:
> After applying -Wmaybe-uninitialized manually, two build warnings are
> triggered:
>
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:940:11: warning: ‘io’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 940 | io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
>
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c: In function ‘ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd’:
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c:1531:9: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>
> Fix the 1st one by removing 'io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;' which
> isn't needed since the function always return successfully after setting
> this flag.
>
> Fix the 2nd one by always initializing 'ret'.
>
> Also fix another sparse warning of 'sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return
> expression' by changing return type of ublk_setup_iod().
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index f10c4319dc1f..2c1b01d7f27d 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req)
> return flags;
> }
>
> -static int ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
> +static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
> {
> struct ublksrv_io_desc *iod = ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag);
> struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[req->tag];
> @@ -937,7 +937,6 @@ static int ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>
> out:
> - io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
> io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, ret, 0);
Hi Ming,
Actually I found one potential bug BEFORE this commit.
In ublk_ch_uring_cmd(), there is a check:
/* there is pending io cmd, something must be wrong */
if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out;
}
Now assume that:
(1) We get a second(duplicate) ublk cmd(such as UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ)
on the same tag and queue from a malicious app,
the check fails as expected because UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE has been set
and ublk_io is queued.
(2) We goto label "out" and execute:
io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE
--> "io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, ret, 0)(ret is -EBUSY)
(2) Then, if the malicious app issues a third ublk cmd(the same cmd_op) on the same
tag and queue, the check passes because UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE is unset
(it should fail since it is a duplicate cmd)
In this commit you do fix it by removing "io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE"
in "out" routine for another reason.(‘io’ may be used uninitialized)
However I have just found a side effect(maybe fix a potential bug) and share it here. :)
> pr_devel("%s: complete: cmd op %d, tag %d ret %x io_flags %x\n",
> __func__, cmd_op, tag, ret, io->flags);
> @@ -1299,13 +1298,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_get_queue_affinity(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
> struct ublk_device *ub;
> unsigned long queue;
> unsigned int retlen;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
> if (!ub)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> queue = header->data[0];
> if (queue >= ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues)
> goto out;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-18 12:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-16 9:53 [PATCH] ublk_drv: fix build warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized and one sparse warning Ming Lei
2022-07-16 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-18 12:10 ` Ziyang Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox