From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/2] ublk_drv: fix error handling of ublk_add_dev
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 16:45:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220722084516.624457-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220722084516.624457-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
__ublk_destroy_dev() is called for handling error in ublk_add_dev(),
but either tagset isn't allocated or mutex isn't initialized.
So fix the issue by letting replacing ublk_add_dev with a
ublk_add_tag_set function that is much more limited in scope and
instead unwind every single step directly in ublk_ctrl_add_dev.
To allow for this refactor the device freeing so that there is
a helper for freeing the device number instead of coupling that
with freeing the mutex and the memory.
Note that this now copies the dev_info to userspace before adding
the character device. This not only simplifies the erro handling
in ublk_ctrl_add_dev, but also means that the character device
can only be seen by userspace if the device addition succeeded.
Based on a patch from Ming Lei.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f058f40b639c..67f91a80a7ab 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int ublk_init_queues(struct ublk_device *ub)
return ret;
}
-static int __ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
+static int ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
{
int i = idx;
int err;
@@ -1027,16 +1027,12 @@ static int __ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
return err;
}
-static void __ublk_destroy_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+static void ublk_free_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
spin_lock(&ublk_idr_lock);
idr_remove(&ublk_index_idr, ub->ub_number);
wake_up_all(&ublk_idr_wq);
spin_unlock(&ublk_idr_lock);
-
- mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
-
- kfree(ub);
}
static void ublk_cdev_rel(struct device *dev)
@@ -1045,8 +1041,9 @@ static void ublk_cdev_rel(struct device *dev)
blk_mq_free_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
-
- __ublk_destroy_dev(ub);
+ ublk_free_dev_number(ub);
+ mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
+ kfree(ub);
}
static int ublk_add_chdev(struct ublk_device *ub)
@@ -1092,24 +1089,8 @@ static void ublk_align_max_io_size(struct ublk_device *ub)
round_down(max_rq_bytes, PAGE_SIZE) >> ub->bs_shift;
}
-/* add tag_set & cdev, cleanup everything in case of failure */
-static int ublk_add_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
- int err = -ENOMEM;
-
- /* We are not ready to support zero copy */
- ub->dev_info.flags[0] &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
-
- ub->bs_shift = ilog2(ub->dev_info.block_size);
- ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues = min_t(unsigned int,
- ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, nr_cpu_ids);
-
- INIT_WORK(&ub->stop_work, ublk_stop_work_fn);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ub->monitor_work, ublk_daemon_monitor_work);
-
- if (ublk_init_queues(ub))
- goto out_destroy_dev;
-
ub->tag_set.ops = &ublk_mq_ops;
ub->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues;
ub->tag_set.queue_depth = ub->dev_info.queue_depth;
@@ -1117,22 +1098,7 @@ static int ublk_add_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
ub->tag_set.cmd_size = sizeof(struct ublk_rq_data);
ub->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
ub->tag_set.driver_data = ub;
- err = blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
- if (err)
- goto out_deinit_queues;
-
- ublk_align_max_io_size(ub);
- mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
- spin_lock_init(&ub->mm_lock);
-
- /* add char dev so that ublksrv daemon can be setup */
- return ublk_add_chdev(ub);
-
-out_deinit_queues:
- ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
-out_destroy_dev:
- __ublk_destroy_dev(ub);
- return err;
+ return blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
}
static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
@@ -1318,26 +1284,56 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
ub = kzalloc(sizeof(*ub), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ub)
goto out_unlock;
+ mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
+ spin_lock_init(&ub->mm_lock);
+ INIT_WORK(&ub->stop_work, ublk_stop_work_fn);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ub->monitor_work, ublk_daemon_monitor_work);
- ret = __ublk_alloc_dev_number(ub, header->dev_id);
- if (ret < 0) {
- kfree(ub);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
+ ret = ublk_alloc_dev_number(ub, header->dev_id);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out_free_ub;
memcpy(&ub->dev_info, &info, sizeof(info));
/* update device id */
ub->dev_info.dev_id = ub->ub_number;
- ret = ublk_add_dev(ub);
+ /* We are not ready to support zero copy */
+ ub->dev_info.flags[0] &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
+
+ ub->bs_shift = ilog2(ub->dev_info.block_size);
+ ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues = min_t(unsigned int,
+ ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, nr_cpu_ids);
+ ublk_align_max_io_size(ub);
+
+ ret = ublk_init_queues(ub);
if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_free_dev_number;
- if (copy_to_user(argp, &ub->dev_info, sizeof(info))) {
- ublk_remove(ub);
- ret = -EFAULT;
- }
+ ret = ublk_add_tag_set(ub);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_deinit_queues;
+
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_to_user(argp, &ub->dev_info, sizeof(info)))
+ goto out_free_tag_set;
+
+ /*
+ * Add the char dev so that ublksrv daemon can be setup.
+ * ublk_add_chdev() will cleanup everything if it fails.
+ */
+ ret = ublk_add_chdev(ub);
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+out_free_tag_set:
+ blk_mq_free_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
+out_deinit_queues:
+ ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
+out_free_dev_number:
+ ublk_free_dev_number(ub);
+out_free_ub:
+ mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
+ kfree(ub);
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ublk_ctl_mutex);
return ret;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-22 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-22 8:45 [PATCH V3 0/2] ublk_drv: make sure that correct flags(features) returned to userspace Ming Lei
2022-07-22 8:45 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-07-22 8:57 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] ublk_drv: fix error handling of ublk_add_dev Ziyang Zhang
2022-07-22 8:45 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] ublk_drv: make sure that correct flags(features) returned to userspace Ming Lei
2022-07-22 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-22 10:03 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220722084516.624457-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox