public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/2] ublk_drv: fix error handling of ublk_add_dev
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 16:45:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220722084516.624457-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220722084516.624457-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

__ublk_destroy_dev() is called for handling error in ublk_add_dev(),
but either tagset isn't allocated or mutex isn't initialized.

So fix the issue by letting replacing ublk_add_dev with a
ublk_add_tag_set function that is much more limited in scope and
instead unwind every single step directly in ublk_ctrl_add_dev.
To allow for this refactor the device freeing so that there is
a helper for freeing the device number instead of coupling that
with freeing the mutex and the memory.

Note that this now copies the dev_info to userspace before adding
the character device.  This not only simplifies the erro handling
in ublk_ctrl_add_dev, but also means that the character device
can only be seen by userspace if the device addition succeeded.

Based on a patch from Ming Lei.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f058f40b639c..67f91a80a7ab 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int ublk_init_queues(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
+static int ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
 {
 	int i = idx;
 	int err;
@@ -1027,16 +1027,12 @@ static int __ublk_alloc_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub, int idx)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void __ublk_destroy_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+static void ublk_free_dev_number(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
 	spin_lock(&ublk_idr_lock);
 	idr_remove(&ublk_index_idr, ub->ub_number);
 	wake_up_all(&ublk_idr_wq);
 	spin_unlock(&ublk_idr_lock);
-
-	mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
-
-	kfree(ub);
 }
 
 static void ublk_cdev_rel(struct device *dev)
@@ -1045,8 +1041,9 @@ static void ublk_cdev_rel(struct device *dev)
 
 	blk_mq_free_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
 	ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
-
-	__ublk_destroy_dev(ub);
+	ublk_free_dev_number(ub);
+	mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
+	kfree(ub);
 }
 
 static int ublk_add_chdev(struct ublk_device *ub)
@@ -1092,24 +1089,8 @@ static void ublk_align_max_io_size(struct ublk_device *ub)
 		round_down(max_rq_bytes, PAGE_SIZE) >> ub->bs_shift;
 }
 
-/* add tag_set & cdev, cleanup everything in case of failure */
-static int ublk_add_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
-	int err = -ENOMEM;
-
-	/* We are not ready to support zero copy */
-	ub->dev_info.flags[0] &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
-
-	ub->bs_shift = ilog2(ub->dev_info.block_size);
-	ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues = min_t(unsigned int,
-			ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, nr_cpu_ids);
-
-	INIT_WORK(&ub->stop_work, ublk_stop_work_fn);
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ub->monitor_work, ublk_daemon_monitor_work);
-
-	if (ublk_init_queues(ub))
-		goto out_destroy_dev;
-
 	ub->tag_set.ops = &ublk_mq_ops;
 	ub->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues;
 	ub->tag_set.queue_depth = ub->dev_info.queue_depth;
@@ -1117,22 +1098,7 @@ static int ublk_add_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	ub->tag_set.cmd_size = sizeof(struct ublk_rq_data);
 	ub->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
 	ub->tag_set.driver_data = ub;
-	err = blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
-	if (err)
-		goto out_deinit_queues;
-
-	ublk_align_max_io_size(ub);
-	mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
-	spin_lock_init(&ub->mm_lock);
-
-	/* add char dev so that ublksrv daemon can be setup */
-	return ublk_add_chdev(ub);
-
-out_deinit_queues:
-	ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
-out_destroy_dev:
-	__ublk_destroy_dev(ub);
-	return err;
+	return blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
 }
 
 static void ublk_remove(struct ublk_device *ub)
@@ -1318,26 +1284,56 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
 	ub = kzalloc(sizeof(*ub), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ub)
 		goto out_unlock;
+	mutex_init(&ub->mutex);
+	spin_lock_init(&ub->mm_lock);
+	INIT_WORK(&ub->stop_work, ublk_stop_work_fn);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ub->monitor_work, ublk_daemon_monitor_work);
 
-	ret = __ublk_alloc_dev_number(ub, header->dev_id);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		kfree(ub);
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
+	ret = ublk_alloc_dev_number(ub, header->dev_id);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out_free_ub;
 
 	memcpy(&ub->dev_info, &info, sizeof(info));
 
 	/* update device id */
 	ub->dev_info.dev_id = ub->ub_number;
 
-	ret = ublk_add_dev(ub);
+	/* We are not ready to support zero copy */
+	ub->dev_info.flags[0] &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
+
+	ub->bs_shift = ilog2(ub->dev_info.block_size);
+	ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues = min_t(unsigned int,
+			ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, nr_cpu_ids);
+	ublk_align_max_io_size(ub);
+
+	ret = ublk_init_queues(ub);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out_unlock;
+		goto out_free_dev_number;
 
-	if (copy_to_user(argp, &ub->dev_info, sizeof(info))) {
-		ublk_remove(ub);
-		ret = -EFAULT;
-	}
+	ret = ublk_add_tag_set(ub);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_deinit_queues;
+
+	ret = -EFAULT;
+	if (copy_to_user(argp, &ub->dev_info, sizeof(info)))
+		goto out_free_tag_set;
+
+	/*
+	 * Add the char dev so that ublksrv daemon can be setup.
+	 * ublk_add_chdev() will cleanup everything if it fails.
+	 */
+	ret = ublk_add_chdev(ub);
+	goto out_unlock;
+
+out_free_tag_set:
+	blk_mq_free_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
+out_deinit_queues:
+	ublk_deinit_queues(ub);
+out_free_dev_number:
+	ublk_free_dev_number(ub);
+out_free_ub:
+	mutex_destroy(&ub->mutex);
+	kfree(ub);
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&ublk_ctl_mutex);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-22  8:45 [PATCH V3 0/2] ublk_drv: make sure that correct flags(features) returned to userspace Ming Lei
2022-07-22  8:45 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-07-22  8:57   ` [PATCH V3 1/2] ublk_drv: fix error handling of ublk_add_dev Ziyang Zhang
2022-07-22  8:45 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] ublk_drv: make sure that correct flags(features) returned to userspace Ming Lei
2022-07-22  9:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-22 10:03     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220722084516.624457-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox