From: Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu>
To: mcgrof@kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de, jeffm@suse.com,
kzak@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ming.lei@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: default BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD to y
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:55:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221228165547.27502-1-anisse@astier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YhlI4bKqYpknNgBa@bombadil.infradead.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:23:45 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 07:14:40PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > As Luis reported, losetup currently doesn't properly create the loop
> > device without this if the device node already exists because old
> > scripts created it manually. So default to y for now and remove the
> > aggressive removal schedule.
> >
> > Reported-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I'm saddened by the fact that we're not going to get an idea of how far
> and wide the stupid mknod prior to modprobe use is by making this
> as y default even though I know this is the right thing to do.
>
> I think our ownly measure of success here is to really push
> Linux distributions to start disabling BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD
> and getting their help to see what burts into flames.
I just spent some time bisecting another thing that regresses without
BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD (which was disabled here): mdadm software raid
auto-assemble on boot (with udev).
I think it's because it tries to open /dev/md127 and then fails since it's not
created automatically.
Regards,
Anisse
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 18:14 [PATCH] block: default BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD to y Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-25 18:37 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-25 20:31 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-25 21:23 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-28 16:55 ` Anisse Astier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221228165547.27502-1-anisse@astier.eu \
--to=anisse@astier.eu \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox