Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: paolo.valente@linaro.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jack@suse.cz, hch@lst.de, damien.lemoal@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:57:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230102155730.hkxfmuq6do47dmfc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222191641.1643117-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

On Fri 23-12-22 03:16:38, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> We have already avoided a circular list in bfq_setup_merge (see comments
> in bfq_setup_merge() for details), so bfq_queue will not appear in it's
> new_bfqq list. Just remove this check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 7c91d16dbf6f..89995815dbae 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -5273,8 +5273,6 @@ void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  	 */
>  	__bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq;
>  	while (__bfqq) {
> -		if (__bfqq == bfqq)
> -			break;
>  		next = __bfqq->new_bfqq;
>  		bfq_put_queue(__bfqq);
>  		__bfqq = next;
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-02 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 19:16 [PATCH RESEND v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq Kemeng Shi
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:13   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:14   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:30   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:31   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:34   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:54   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:57   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 15:59   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 16:00   ` Jan Kara
2022-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0 Kemeng Shi
2023-01-02 16:05   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230102155730.hkxfmuq6do47dmfc@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox