From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: handle BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES correctly
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:10:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240329-erosion-zerreden-c65a45286fae@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgZJ54rW2JcWsYPA@casper.infradead.org>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 04:56:07AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 05:11:19PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Last kernel release we introduce CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED. By
> > default this option is set. When it is set the long-standing behavior
> > of being able to write to mounted block devices is enabled.
> >
> > But in order to guard against unintended corruption by writing to the
> > block device buffer cache CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED can be turned
> > off. In that case it isn't possible to write to mounted block devices
> > anymore.
> >
> > A filesystem may open its block devices with BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES
> > which disallows concurrent BLK_OPEN_WRITE access. When we still had the
> > bdev handle around we could recognize BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES because
> > the mode was passed around. Since we managed to get rid of the bdev
> > handle we changed that logic to recognize BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES based
> > on whether the file was opened writable and writes to that block device
> > are blocked. That logic doesn't work because we do allow
> > BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES to be specified without BLK_OPEN_WRITE.
> >
> > So fix the detection logic. Use O_EXCL as an indicator that
> > BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES has been requested. We do the exact same thing
> > for pidfds where O_EXCL means that this is a pidfd that refers to a
> > thread. For userspace open paths O_EXCL will never be retained but for
> > internal opens where we open files that are never installed into a file
> > descriptor table this is fine.
> >
> > Note that BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES is an internal only flag that cannot
> > directly be raised by userspace. It is implicitly raised during
> > mounting.
> >
> > Passes xftests and blktests with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED set and
> > unset.
> >
> > Fixes: 321de651fa56 ("block: don't rely on BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES when yielding write access")
> > Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZfyyEwu9Uq5Pgb94@casper.infradead.org
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
>
> So v1 of this patch works fine. I just got round to testing v2, and it
> does not. Indeed, applying 2/2 causes root to fail to mount:
>
> /dev/root: Can't open blockdev
> List of all bdev filesystems:
> ext3
> ext2
> ext4
> xfs
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(254,0)
>
> Applying only 1/2 boots but fails to fix the bug.
Thanks for testing this. This is odd because I tested with the setup you
provided.
I used the kernel config you sent to me in [2] with an xfs root device
with direct kernel boot and the following xfstests config in [3]. I'm
booting the vm with:
qemu-system-x86_64 -machine type=q35 -smp 1 -m 4G -accel kvm -cpu max -nographic -nodefaults \
-chardev stdio,mux=on,id=console,signal=off -serial chardev:console -mon console \
-kernel /home/ubuntu/data/mkosi-kernel2/mkosi.output.debian/image.vmlinuz \
-drive file=/home/ubuntu/data/mkosi-kernel2/mkosi.output.debian/image.raw,format=raw,if=virtio \
-append "console=ttyS0 root=/dev/vda2 module_blacklist=vmw_vmci systemd.tty.term.ttyS0=screen-256color systemd.tty.columns.ttyS0=96 systemd.tty.rows.ttyS0=46 debug loglevel=4 SYSTEMD_"
Note that the config you gave me in [2] didn't include
CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y which means I got the splat you did. I added this
missing config option and everything worked fine for me.
Can you please test what's in the vfs.fixes branch on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git so we're
sure that we're testing the same thing?
The failures that I see are:
Failures: generic/042 generic/645 generic/682 generic/689 xfs/014
xfs/017 xfs/049 xfs/129 xfs/176 xfs/206 xfs/216 xfs/234 xfs/250 xfs/289
xfs/558 xfs/559
Failed 16 of 930 tests
* generic/645 fails because it requires an unrelated fix to fstests
because we changed idmapped mounts to not not allow empty idmappings.
* generic/689 fails because the providec config doesn't compile tmpfs with POSIX ACL support
* xfs/558 and xfs/559 complain about missing logging
about iomap validation and are unrelated
* All other failures are caused by loop devices which is expected unil
a util-linux is released that contains Jan's fix in [1] so that
mount(8) doesn't hold a writable fd to the loop device anymore and
instead simply uses a read-only one.
[1]: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/commit/1cde32f323e0970f6c7f35940dcc0aea97b821e5
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zf18I2UOGQxeN-Z1@casper.infradead.org
[3]:
#! /bin/bash
set -x
cd ~/src/git/xfstests-dev/
FIRST_DEV=/dev/vda3
SECOND_DEV=/dev/vda4
THIRD_DEV=/dev/vda5
echo "Testing xfs"
cat <<EOF >local.config
FSTYP=xfs
export TEST_DEV=${FIRST_DEV}
export SCRATCH_DEV=${SECOND_DEV}
export LOGWRITE_DEV=${THIRD_DEV}
export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
EOF
sudo mkfs.xfs -f ${FIRST_DEV}
sudo mkfs.xfs -f ${SECOND_DEV}
sudo mkfs.xfs -f ${THIRD_DEV}
sudo ./check -g quick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-23 14:54 [PATCH] block: handle BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES correctly Christian Brauner
2024-03-23 15:59 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-23 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Christian Brauner
2024-03-23 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RFC]: block: count BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES openers Christian Brauner
2024-03-26 13:24 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-25 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: handle BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES correctly Yu Kuai
2024-03-25 12:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-25 13:52 ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-25 13:54 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-26 1:32 ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-26 12:57 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-26 13:17 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-26 13:31 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-26 15:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Brauner
2024-03-26 17:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-26 22:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-26 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Christian Brauner
2024-03-27 12:01 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-29 4:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-29 12:10 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-03-29 15:11 ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-29 15:24 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-03 6:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-03 19:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240329-erosion-zerreden-c65a45286fae@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox