* Re: [PATCH blktests] blktrace/001: Skip test when kernel lockdown is enabled
2026-04-24 14:11 [PATCH blktests] blktrace/001: Skip test when kernel lockdown is enabled Disha Goel
@ 2026-04-29 13:52 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki @ 2026-04-29 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Disha Goel; +Cc: linux-block
On Apr 24, 2026 / 19:41, Disha Goel wrote:
> The blktrace/001 test fails on systems with Secure Boot enabled due to
> kernel lockdown preventing access to debugfs. The test attempts to run
> blktrace which requires access to /sys/kernel/debug/block/*/trace*
> files, but kernel lockdown (enabled automatically with Secure Boot)
> blocks this access, resulting in "Operation not permitted" errors.
Hello Disha, thanks for the patch. I tried to recreate the "Operation not
permitted" error on my test node, but I can not recreate it. I tried the
command lines below, and saw blktrace worked fine with lockdown=confidentiality
condition. This means that blktrace can access /sys/kernel/debug/block/*/trace*
even when the kernel is locked down.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
[none] integrity confidentiality
root@testnode1:~# echo confidentiality > /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
none integrity [confidentiality]
root@testnode1:~# cd /tmp
root@testnode1:/tmp# blktrace -d /dev/sdc &
[1] 1014
root@testnode1:/tmp# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=4k count=1 oflag=direct
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4096 bytes (4.1 kB, 4.0 KiB) copied, 0.00274992 s, 1.5 MB/s
root@testnode1:/tmp# kill 1014
root@testnode1:/tmp# === sdc ===
CPU 0: 6 events, 1 KiB data
CPU 1: 0 events, 0 KiB data
CPU 2: 658 events, 31 KiB data
CPU 3: 797 events, 38 KiB data
Total: 1461 events (dropped 0), 69 KiB data
[1]+ Done blktrace -d /dev/sdc
root@testnode1:/tmp# blkparse -i sdc | head
8,32 2 1 0.000000000 1048 Q WS 0 + 8 [dd]
8,32 2 0 0.000013242 1048 1,0 m N bfq [bfq_limit_depth] wr_busy 0 sync 1 depth 256
8,32 2 2 0.001495890 1048 G WS 0 + 8 [dd]
8,32 2 3 0.001497997 1048 P N [dd]
8,32 2 4 0.001499079 1048 U N [dd] 1
8,32 2 0 0.001574560 1048 1,0 m N bfq0A new_ioprio 4 new_weight 40
8,32 2 0 0.001577177 1048 1,0 m N bfq1048S allocated
8,32 2 0 0.001581069 1048 1,0 m N bfq1048S get_request 00000000e21f70ba: bfqq 000000001cef6c8d, 2
8,32 2 5 0.001583291 1048 I WS 0 + 8 [dd]
8,32 2 0 0.001584861 1048 1,0 m N bfq1048S add_request 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to understand why the blktrace error happens in your environment
and does not happen in my environment. It will affect how to judge the skip of
the test case blktrace/001.
Could you share your system set up conditions? FYI, I used Fedora 43, QEMU VM,
Intel server and v7.1-rc1 kernel for the trial above. I'm guessing any
difference between the two environments causes the blktrace behavior difference.
P.S. I found that kmemleak does not work when lockdown=confidentiality
condition. This indicates that the kernel lockdown feature works for kmemleak
as expected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
[none] integrity confidentiality
root@testnode1:~# echo confidentiality > /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/security/lockdown
none integrity [confidentiality]
root@testnode1:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
cat: /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: Operation not permitted
---------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread