From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 13/18] fs: tolerate per-superblock freeze errors on shared devices
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:08:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-13-7df6b864028e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-0-7df6b864028e@kernel.org>
When several superblocks share a device, keep it frozen even if some of
them failed to freeze and swallow the error: rolling the others back
via thaw_super() can fail too, so neither is a clear win. A single
filesystem still reports its error, and a sync_blockdev() failure is
always reported. Thaw follows the same rule.
A device can only be shared once superblocks claim it with a common
exclusivity token, which erofs starts doing in the next patch; for
everyone else the loop visits exactly one superblock and the behavior
is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/super.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 236e868209a4..a83f58755cf8 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1548,13 +1548,15 @@ static void fs_bdev_sync(struct block_device *bdev)
* devices is frozen once per device and stays frozen until all are thawed; the
* block layer nests these freezes so the count stays balanced.
*
- * Return: 0, or the first error from freezing a superblock or syncing the
- * block device.
+ * Return: 0, or the error from the one superblock on a single-fs device. When
+ * several superblocks share @bdev a per-superblock failure is swallowed
+ * (see below), but a sync_blockdev() failure is always reported.
*/
static int fs_bdev_freeze(struct block_device *bdev)
{
dev_t dev = bdev->bd_dev;
struct super_dev *sb_dev;
+ unsigned int count = 0;
int error = 0, err;
lockdep_assert_held(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
@@ -1568,8 +1570,17 @@ static int fs_bdev_freeze(struct block_device *bdev)
if (err && !error)
error = err;
deactivate_super(sb_dev->sd_sb);
+ count++;
}
+ /*
+ * When several superblocks share the device, keep it frozen even if some
+ * of them failed to freeze and swallow the error: rolling the rest back
+ * via thaw_super() can fail too, so neither is a clear win. A single
+ * filesystem (count == 1) still reports its error.
+ */
+ if (error && count > 1)
+ error = 0;
if (!error)
error = sync_blockdev(bdev);
return error;
@@ -1583,12 +1594,14 @@ static int fs_bdev_freeze(struct block_device *bdev)
* A zero return does not imply a superblock is fully unfrozen; it may have been
* frozen more than once (by the kernel or via another device).
*
- * Return: 0, or the first error from thawing a superblock.
+ * Return: 0, or the first error on a single-fs device; a shared device swallows
+ * per-superblock errors, as fs_bdev_freeze() does.
*/
static int fs_bdev_thaw(struct block_device *bdev)
{
dev_t dev = bdev->bd_dev;
struct super_dev *sb_dev;
+ unsigned int count = 0;
int error = 0, err;
lockdep_assert_held(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
@@ -1602,8 +1615,12 @@ static int fs_bdev_thaw(struct block_device *bdev)
if (err && !error)
error = err;
deactivate_super(sb_dev->sd_sb);
+ count++;
}
+ /* Shared device: swallow per-superblock errors, like fs_bdev_freeze(). */
+ if (error && count > 1)
+ error = 0;
return error;
}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 14:08 [PATCH RFC v2 00/18] fs: support freeze/thaw/mark_dead/sync with shared devices Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/18] xfs: fix the error unwind in xfs_open_devices() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/18] super: convert s_count to refcount_t s_passive Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/18] super: take lock after last reference count Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/18] fs, block: move blk_mode_t and fop_flags_t into <linux/types.h> Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/18] ext4: use anonymous devices for KUnit test superblocks Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/18] ocfs2: don't reset s_dev on dismount Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/18] fs: maintain a global device-to-superblock table Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/18] fs: add dedicated block device open helpers for filesystems Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/18] xfs: port to fs_bdev_file_open_by_path() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/18] btrfs: open via dedicated fs bdev helpers Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/18] ext4: " Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/18] fs: look up superblocks via the device table in fs_holder_ops Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/18] erofs: open via dedicated fs bdev helpers Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/18] f2fs: " Christian Brauner
2026-06-17 3:17 ` Chao Yu
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/18] super: make fs_holder_ops private Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/18] fs: look up the superblock via the device table in user_get_super() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/18] selftests/filesystems: add ustat() coverage Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-13-7df6b864028e@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox