From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 02/18] super: convert s_count to refcount_t s_passive
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:08:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-2-7df6b864028e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-0-7df6b864028e@kernel.org>
The superblock carries two counters: s_active, the active reference
count that keeps the filesystem usable, and s_count, the passive
reference count that merely keeps the structure itself alive. Turn the
passive count into a refcount_t and rename it to s_passive to make the
pairing with s_active obvious.
Everything is still serialized by sb_lock, so there is no functional
change; the conversion buys the usual refcount_t saturation and
underflow checking. The following patches start dropping passive
references without holding sb_lock and make the device-to-superblock
table hold one passive reference per registered entry, which a plain
integer cannot support.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/super.c | 18 +++++++++---------
include/linux/fs/super_types.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index a8fd61136aaf..25dd72b550e0 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static bool super_flags(const struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flags)
* creation will succeed and SB_BORN is set by vfs_get_tree() or we're
* woken and we'll see SB_DYING.
*
- * The caller must have acquired a temporary reference on @sb->s_count.
+ * The caller must have acquired a temporary reference on @sb->s_passive.
*
* Return: The function returns true if SB_BORN was set and with
* s_umount held. The function returns false if SB_DYING was
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
spin_lock_init(&s->s_inode_wblist_lock);
fserror_mount(s);
- s->s_count = 1;
+ refcount_set(&s->s_passive, 1);
atomic_set(&s->s_active, 1);
mutex_init(&s->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
lockdep_set_class(&s->s_vfs_rename_mutex, &type->s_vfs_rename_key);
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
*/
static void __put_super(struct super_block *s)
{
- if (!--s->s_count) {
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&s->s_passive)) {
list_del_init(&s->s_list);
WARN_ON(s->s_dentry_lru.node);
WARN_ON(s->s_inode_lru.node);
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static bool grab_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
bool locked;
- sb->s_count++;
+ refcount_inc(&sb->s_passive);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
locked = super_lock_excl(sb);
if (locked) {
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static bool grab_super(struct super_block *sb)
* lock held in read mode in case of success. On successful return,
* the caller must drop the s_umount lock when done.
*
- * Note that unlike get_super() et.al. this one does *not* bump ->s_count.
+ * Note that unlike get_super() et.al. this one does *not* bump ->s_passive.
* The reason why it's safe is that we are OK with doing trylock instead
* of down_read(). There's a couple of places that are OK with that, but
* it's very much not a general-purpose interface.
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void __iterate_supers(void (*f)(struct super_block *, void *), void *arg,
sb = next_super(sb, flags)) {
if (super_flags(sb, SB_DYING))
continue;
- sb->s_count++;
+ refcount_inc(&sb->s_passive);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
if (flags & SUPER_ITER_UNLOCKED) {
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ void iterate_supers_type(struct file_system_type *type,
if (super_flags(sb, SB_DYING))
continue;
- sb->s_count++;
+ refcount_inc(&sb->s_passive);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
locked = super_lock_shared(sb);
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ struct super_block *user_get_super(dev_t dev, bool excl)
if (sb->s_dev != dev)
continue;
- sb->s_count++;
+ refcount_inc(&sb->s_passive);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
locked = super_lock(sb, excl);
@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct super_block *bdev_super_lock(struct block_device *bdev, bool excl)
/* Make sure sb doesn't go away from under us */
spin_lock(&sb_lock);
- sb->s_count++;
+ refcount_inc(&sb->s_passive);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs/super_types.h b/include/linux/fs/super_types.h
index ef7941e9dc79..68747182abf9 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs/super_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs/super_types.h
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct super_block {
unsigned long s_magic;
struct dentry *s_root;
struct rw_semaphore s_umount;
- int s_count;
+ refcount_t s_passive;
atomic_t s_active;
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
void *s_security;
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 14:08 [PATCH RFC v2 00/18] fs: support freeze/thaw/mark_dead/sync with shared devices Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/18] xfs: fix the error unwind in xfs_open_devices() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/18] super: take lock after last reference count Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/18] fs, block: move blk_mode_t and fop_flags_t into <linux/types.h> Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/18] ext4: use anonymous devices for KUnit test superblocks Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/18] ocfs2: don't reset s_dev on dismount Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/18] fs: maintain a global device-to-superblock table Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/18] fs: add dedicated block device open helpers for filesystems Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/18] xfs: port to fs_bdev_file_open_by_path() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/18] btrfs: open via dedicated fs bdev helpers Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/18] ext4: " Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/18] fs: look up superblocks via the device table in fs_holder_ops Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/18] fs: tolerate per-superblock freeze errors on shared devices Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/18] erofs: open via dedicated fs bdev helpers Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/18] f2fs: " Christian Brauner
2026-06-17 3:17 ` Chao Yu
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/18] super: make fs_holder_ops private Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/18] fs: look up the superblock via the device table in user_get_super() Christian Brauner
2026-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/18] selftests/filesystems: add ustat() coverage Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616-work-super-bdev_holder_global-v2-2-7df6b864028e@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox