From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Leonid Ravich <lravich@amazon.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@nxp.com>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] crypto: skcipher - per-request multi-data-unit batching
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:50:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616045023.GA113934@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajDNT5jVGgRtiNH6@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:13:03PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:53:17PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > So in other words, this series slows down dm-crypt and crypto_skcipher
> > for everyone to optimize for an out-of-tree driver. And there's also no
> > benchmark showing that your driver is even worth it over just using the
> > CPU.
>
> There is no reason why the software fallback should be slower
> than the status quo. Existing callers of the Crypto API will
> be issuing one indirect function call per data unit. With the
> new scheme, the indirect calls per unit moves from from the caller
> into the Crypto API.
Have you checked the code? This patchset adds overhead in multiple
places. Dynamically allocating multiple scatterlists and then parsing
them, adding a new field to skcipher_request for everyone, new checks in
crypto_skcipher_en/decrypt for everyone, new checks to validate the data
unit size that the caller knew was valid in the first place, etc.
> In fact, we could move it down further and improve upon the
> status quo by splitting the data in each algorithm implemntation
> so that the calls per unit become direct function calls and only
> the overall call into the Crypto API remains indirect.
That's not what this patchset does. But also, as we know, a better way
to eliminate "Crypto API" overhead is to call the algorithms directly.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 11:14 [PATCH v4 0/3] crypto: skcipher - per-request multi-data-unit batching Leonid Ravich
2026-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] crypto: skcipher - add per-request data_unit_size with auto-splitting Leonid Ravich
2026-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] crypto: testmgr - test for multi-data-unit dispatch Leonid Ravich
2026-06-15 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] dm crypt: batch all sectors of a bio per crypto request Leonid Ravich
2026-06-15 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] crypto: skcipher - per-request multi-data-unit batching Eric Biggers
2026-06-16 4:13 ` Herbert Xu
2026-06-16 4:50 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-06-16 4:53 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616045023.GA113934@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lravich@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox