Re: [PATCH blktests] block/044: basic block error injection sanity test

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 01:06:29PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2026 / 06:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 01:31:06PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > > > Nit: Majority of the blktests test cases have GPL-3.0+. If you do not mind,
> > > > > I suggest GPL-3.0+.
> > > > 
> > > > Well a mix of licenses is obviously bad, although I hate the GPL 3 with
> > > > passion.
> > > 
> > > I see, I respoect author's choice.
> > 
> > Well, if the common bits are GPLv3+ we can't actually legally combine
> > them with test that have a pure GPLv2 license.  So I need at least
> > GPL-2.0+.
> 
> I see... I read back GPLv2 and v3. My understanding is that:
> 
>  - GPL v3 adds additional restrictions on top of v2, such as section 6
>    "Installation information" or section 3 "Legal Rights from Antci-
>    Circumvention Law".
>  - The v3 additions conflict with the GPL v2 section6, that says:
>    "You may not impose any further restrictions on the recepients'
>     excercise of the rights granted here in."

Yeah.

> Thanks. I will list up original authors and contributors of the test cases,
> and then bring up license fix up discussion.

Thanks.  And I'll resend this test case with your fixups.