From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 16:19:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802081922.840-1-hdanton@sina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728045340.770-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:53:37 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:39:17 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>>On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:23:43 +0800 Hillf Danton wrote:
>>>On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:29 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> wrote:
>>>> For archive purpose, syzbot report [1] where udp was not invovled defies
>>>> what is fixed in d532cddb6c60 ("nbd: Reclassify sockets to avoid lockdep
>>>> circular dependency") -- "Since the UDP socket and the NBD TCP/TLS socket
>>>> are different, this is a false positive."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] Subject: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in inet_shutdown (3)
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69c37e6a.a70a0220.234938.0045.GAE@google.com/
>>>>
>>>For archive purpose, syzbot report [2] shows deadlock without either udp or
>>>tcp invovled. But it sounds false positive because kernfs node is removed
>>>while the filesystem is filling super block.
>>>
>>>[2] Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_remove_by_name_ns (2)
>>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6a5ca0b7.f1649fcc.2a4208.03f3.GAE@google.com/
>>>
>>For archive purpose, syzbot reports [3,4] show deadlock without either udp or
>>tcp invovled.
>>
>>[3] Subject: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_iop_permission (2)
>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6a5d14b8.42649fcc.6186.0078.GAE@google.com/
>>
>>[4] Subject: [syzbot] [kernel?] possible deadlock in netif_reset_xps_queues_gt (3)
>>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6a5d14b9.42649fcc.6186.0079.GAE@google.com/
>>
>For archive purpose, syzbot report [5] shows deadlock without lock_sock invovled.
>
>[5] Subject: [syzbot] [pm?] possible deadlock in thermal_zone_device_set_mode
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6a676313.073198cf.94f0f.0033.GAE@google.com/
>
For archive purpose, syzbot report [6] shows deadlock without nbd invovled.
[6] Subject: [syzbot] [block?] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in blkcg_deactivate_policy (2)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6a6e8a06.6ce73036.24301b.0015.GAE@google.com/
BTW Eric do you see how difficult it is to fix the fking deadlock?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 23:52 [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-06-22 1:43 ` Hillf Danton
2026-06-22 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-23 0:07 ` Hillf Danton
2026-06-23 0:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-23 0:44 ` Hillf Danton
2026-06-29 5:28 ` Hillf Danton
2026-06-30 7:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-30 12:24 ` Hillf Danton
2026-07-20 2:23 ` Hillf Danton
2026-07-20 2:39 ` Hillf Danton
2026-07-28 4:53 ` Hillf Danton
2026-08-02 8:19 ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2026-08-16 1:49 ` Hillf Danton
2026-06-22 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-22 22:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802081922.840-1-hdanton@sina.com \
--to=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=syzbot+6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox