From: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] s390/dasd: Snapshot intrc before freeing the request block
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:15:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805111612.1285190-5-sth@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805111612.1285190-1-sth@linux.ibm.com>
__dasd_cleanup_cqr() maps the completion result to a block status by
reading cqr->intrc, but only after discipline->free_cp() has returned the
request block to its memory pool (dasd_eckd_free_cp() ends in
dasd_sfree_request()). On SMP another CPU can reallocate that block and
overwrite cqr->intrc before it is read, completing the request with the
wrong error. proc_bytes is already snapshotted before free_cp() for the
same reason; do the same for intrc.
Reviewed-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/block/dasd.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd.c
index 56ef38243f82..34b563917098 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd.c
@@ -2699,17 +2699,23 @@ static void __dasd_cleanup_cqr(struct dasd_ccw_req *cqr)
struct request *req;
blk_status_t error = BLK_STS_OK;
unsigned int proc_bytes;
- int status;
+ int status, intrc;
req = (struct request *) cqr->callback_data;
dasd_profile_end(cqr->block, cqr, req);
+ /*
+ * free_cp() returns the request block to its memory pool, so snapshot
+ * everything still needed from cqr before calling it - another CPU can
+ * reallocate and overwrite the block right after.
+ */
proc_bytes = cqr->proc_bytes;
+ intrc = cqr->intrc;
status = cqr->block->base->discipline->free_cp(cqr, req);
if (status < 0)
error = errno_to_blk_status(status);
else if (status == 0) {
- switch (cqr->intrc) {
+ switch (intrc) {
case -EPERM:
/*
* DASD doesn't implement SCSI/NVMe reservations, but it
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 11:15 [PATCH 00/19] s390/dasd: ESE Performance improvements Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:15 ` [PATCH 01/19] s390/dasd: Do not complete a failed ESE read as successful Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:15 ` [PATCH 02/19] s390/dasd: Propagate partial completion length across ERP recovery Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:15 ` [PATCH 03/19] s390/dasd: Guard sysfs discipline callbacks against unallocated private data Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:15 ` Stefan Haberland [this message]
2026-08-05 11:15 ` [PATCH 05/19] s390/dasd: Optimize max blocks per request for track alignment Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:15 ` [PATCH 06/19] s390/dasd: Use GFP_KERNEL in dasd_alloc_device() Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 07/19] s390/dasd: Add defines for the Extended Address Volume track address Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 08/19] s390/dasd: Add infrastructure for ESE full-track write Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 09/19] s390/dasd: Add range-based format-track collision detection Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 10/19] s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 11/19] s390/dasd: Add dasd_eckd_build_cp_tpm_writefulltrack() Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 12/19] s390/dasd: Use WRITE_FULL_TRACK in ESE format handler Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 13/19] s390/dasd: Add full_track_bias to control fulltrack write mode Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 14/19] s390/dasd: Derive adaptive ESE fulltrack heuristic from ft_bias Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 15/19] s390/dasd: Stamp a format label into newly formatted volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 16/19] s390/dasd: Detect ESE volumes from the on-disk format label Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 17/19] s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 18/19] s390/dasd: Re-enable discard support for ESE volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 11:16 ` [PATCH 19/19] s390/dasd: Read cached unit address and LSS in the CCW build path Stefan Haberland
2026-08-05 12:32 ` [PATCH 00/19] s390/dasd: ESE Performance improvements Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805111612.1285190-5-sth@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox