Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/12] zloop: fix zone reporting consistency
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:16:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <235e9b84-4bfe-488c-aacf-b31d30d7fb8d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109095144.819709-7-dlemoal@kernel.org>

On 11/9/26 10:51 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> In zloop_report_zones(), filling the write pointer and condition of a zone
> descriptor separately outside of the zone wp_lock can lead to an
> inconsistent zone report with a write pointer potentially not being
> consistent with the condition being reported. Avoid such inconsistency by
> filling both fields while holding the zone wp_lock.
> 
> Fixes: fcc6eaa3a03a ("zloop: introduce the ordered_zone_append configuration parameter")
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/block/zloop.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zloop.c b/drivers/block/zloop.c
> index 96666742523b..844a9f5db6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zloop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zloop.c
> @@ -992,8 +992,8 @@ static int zloop_report_zones(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector,
>   		blkz.len = zlo->zone_size;
>   		spin_lock(&zone->wp_lock);
>   		blkz.wp = zone->wp;
> -		spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock);
>   		blkz.cond = zone->cond;
> +		spin_unlock(&zone->wp_lock);
>   		if (test_bit(ZLOOP_ZONE_CONV, &zone->flags)) {
>   			blkz.type = BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL;
>   			blkz.capacity = zlo->zone_size;

Reviewed=by: Hannes REinecke <hare@kernel.org>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  9:51 [PATCH v8 00/12] Add support for storage element depopulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] block: introduce disk_zone_is_offline() Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] block: refactor blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] block: allow dropping all zone write plugs on revalidation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:13   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] block: introduce storage element management Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] block: add storage element management ioctls Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] zloop: fix zone reporting consistency Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:16   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-11-11 15:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] zloop: add storage element emulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] zloop: add degrade_element control command Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] scsi: scsi_proto: refine the definition of storage element health Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] scsi: sd_zbc: always revalidate zones for disks supporting head depopulation Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-11 15:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] scsi: sd_zbc: define storage element management operations Damien Le Moal
2026-11-09 11:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-09  9:51 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] scsi: sd: fail read commands to offline zones early Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=235e9b84-4bfe-488c-aacf-b31d30d7fb8d@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox