public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 03/12] blk-zoned: Add an argument to blk_zone_plug_bio()
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:54:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d06bfe0-0ea6-4c52-83fa-e933557ea399@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eae89738-44e6-46ea-ada6-665fdfd8db07@kernel.org>


On 7/18/25 12:13 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> I still do not understand why this patch is needed because you can get the
> current CPU submitting the BIO inside blk_zone_plug_bio() with
> raw_smp_processor_id(). That CPU ID should be the same as the cached request
> that we will use only if the BIO is not going through the BIO work, that is, if
> it is the first write BIO in-flight for the zone.

I do not agree with the above. With CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled, migration to 
another CPU may happen after a cached request has been allocated and
before the zoned block device code is called. This can be prevented by
surrounding code with preempt_disable() and preempt_enable(). However, I
don't think that we want to do this in submit_bio() since there is code
in submit_bio() that may sleep (bio_queue_enter()) and sleeping with
preemption disabled is not allowed.

Is there perhaps something that I'm overlooking or misunderstanding?

> Furthermore, for the DM case, you pass a CPU of "-1", but if the DM target needs
> zone append emulation, it will use zone write plugging. So the same control as
> for blk-mq is needed.

This "-1" means that it is not known from which CPU a request will be
allocated since a migration to another CPU may happen between the
blk_zone_plug_bio() call and request allocation.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-18 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17 20:57 [PATCH v21 00/12] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 01/12] block: Support block devices that preserve the order of write requests Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 02/12] blk-mq: Restore the zone write order when requeuing Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 03/12] blk-zoned: Add an argument to blk_zone_plug_bio() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:13   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 15:54     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 04/12] blk-zoned: Split an if-statement Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 05/12] blk-zoned: Move code from disk_zone_wplug_add_bio() into its caller Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:15   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 06/12] blk-zoned: Introduce a loop in blk_zone_wplug_bio_work() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 07/12] blk-zoned: Support pipelining of zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 16:29     ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 08/12] scsi: core: Retry unaligned " Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 09/12] scsi: sd: Increase retry count for " Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 10/12] scsi: scsi_debug: Add the preserves_write_order module parameter Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 11/12] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 12/12] ufs: core: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:08 ` [PATCH v21 00/12] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 18:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-22  1:36     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-22 18:24       ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18  7:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 16:32   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d06bfe0-0ea6-4c52-83fa-e933557ea399@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox