From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 07/12] blk-zoned: Support pipelining of zoned writes
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 09:29:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e51d282f-b07a-4c4d-b83d-b4fb5061ba12@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bde0f755-eb69-4799-a9dd-35bf330f78ab@kernel.org>
On 7/18/25 12:38 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 7/18/25 05:58, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> @@ -768,14 +771,19 @@ static bool blk_zone_wplug_handle_reset_all(struct bio *bio)
>> static void disk_zone_wplug_schedule_bio_work(struct gendisk *disk,
>> struct blk_zone_wplug *zwplug)
>> {
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&zwplug->lock);
>
> Unrelated change. Please move this to a prep patch.
I will drop this change since I don't really need this change.
>> +
>> /*
>> * Take a reference on the zone write plug and schedule the submission
>> * of the next plugged BIO. blk_zone_wplug_bio_work() will release the
>> * reference we take here.
>> */
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(zwplug->flags & BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_PLUGGED));
>
> Why do you remove this warning ?
This warning probably can be retained. I will look into restoring it.
>> @@ -972,9 +980,12 @@ static bool blk_zone_wplug_prepare_bio(struct blk_zone_wplug *zwplug,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool blk_zone_wplug_handle_write(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_segs)
>> +static bool blk_zone_wplug_handle_write(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_segs,
>> + int from_cpu)
>> {
>> struct gendisk *disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
>> + const bool ordered_hwq = bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND &&
>> + disk->queue->limits.features & BLK_FEAT_ORDERED_HWQ;
>
> This is not correct. If the BIO is a zone append and
> blk_zone_wplug_handle_write() is called, it means that we need to handle the BIO
> using zone append emulation, that is, the BIO will be a regular write. So you
> must treat it as if it originally was a regular write.
Hmm ... my understanding is that zone append emulation and also the
conversion of REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND into REQ_OP_WRITE happens after the
above code has been executed, namely by blk_zone_wplug_prepare_bio().
From that function:
[ ... ]
if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND) {
bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
bio->bi_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_NOMERGE;
[ ... ]
Did I perhaps misunderstand your comment?
>> + if (refcount_read(&zwplug->ref) == 2)
>> + zwplug->from_cpu = -1;
>
> This needs a comment explaining why you use the plug ref count instead of
> unconditionally clearing from_cpu.
I'm considering to add the following comment:
/*
* zwplug->from_cpu must not change while one or more writes are pending
* for the zone associated with zwplug. zwplug->ref is 2 when the plug
* is unused (one reference taken when the plug was allocated and
* another reference taken by the caller context). Reset
* zwplug->from_cpu if no more writes are pending.
*/
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 20:57 [PATCH v21 00/12] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 01/12] block: Support block devices that preserve the order of write requests Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 02/12] blk-mq: Restore the zone write order when requeuing Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:57 ` [PATCH v21 03/12] blk-zoned: Add an argument to blk_zone_plug_bio() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 15:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 04/12] blk-zoned: Split an if-statement Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 05/12] blk-zoned: Move code from disk_zone_wplug_add_bio() into its caller Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 06/12] blk-zoned: Introduce a loop in blk_zone_wplug_bio_work() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 07/12] blk-zoned: Support pipelining of zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 08/12] scsi: core: Retry unaligned " Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 09/12] scsi: sd: Increase retry count for " Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 10/12] scsi: scsi_debug: Add the preserves_write_order module parameter Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 11/12] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2025-07-17 20:58 ` [PATCH v21 12/12] ufs: core: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:08 ` [PATCH v21 00/12] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 18:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-22 1:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-22 18:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-18 7:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-18 16:32 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e51d282f-b07a-4c4d-b83d-b4fb5061ba12@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox