From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:04:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34bd9a21-07bf-6613-0030-34184134b465@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175CCC87-7977-4580-8048-D4C0BB506615@profihost.ag>
On 2018/7/26 1:44 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2018 um 08:16 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>:
>>
>>> Am 24.07.2018 um 18:36 schrieb Coly Li:
>>>> On 2018/7/24 4:33 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>> Am 24.07.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Coly Li:
>>>>>> On 2018/7/24 3:16 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 24.07.2018 um 06:03 schrieb Coly Li:
>>>>>>> Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
>>>>>>> allows the writeback rate to be faster if there is no I/O request on a
>>>>>>> bcache device. It works well if there is only one bcache device attached
>>>>>>> to the cache set. If there are many bcache devices attached to a cache
>>>>>>> set, it may introduce performance regression because multiple faster
>>>>>>> writeback threads of the idle bcache devices will compete the btree level
>>>>>>> locks with the bcache device who have I/O requests coming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch fixes the above issue by only permitting fast writebac when
>>>>>>> all bcache devices attached on the cache set are idle. And if one of the
>>>>>>> bcache devices has new I/O request coming, minimized all writeback
>>>>>>> throughput immediately and let PI controller __update_writeback_rate()
>>>>>>> to decide the upcoming writeback rate for each bcache device.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also when all bcache devices are idle, limited wrieback rate to a small
>>>>>>> number is wast of thoughput, especially when backing devices are slower
>>>>>>> non-rotation devices (e.g. SATA SSD). This patch sets a max writeback
>>>>>>> rate for each backing device if the whole cache set is idle. A faster
>>>>>>> writeback rate in idle time means new I/Os may have more available space
>>>>>>> for dirty data, and people may observe a better write performance then.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please note bcache may change its cache mode in run time, and this patch
>>>>>>> still works if the cache mode is switched from writeback mode and there
>>>>>>> is still dirty data on cache.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
>>>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.16+
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
>>>>>>> Tested-by: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
>>>>>>> Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
>>>>>>> Cc: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Coly,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i'm still experiencing the same bug as yesterday while rebooting every
>>>>>> two times i get a deadlock in cache_set_free.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sadly it's so late ion the shutdown process that netconsole is already
>>>>>> unloaded or at least i get no messages from while it happens. The traces
>>>>>> look the same like yesterday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you use the v2 patch on latest SLE15 kernel source?
>>>>
>>>> Yes - i use the kernel code from here:
>>>> https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel-source/commits/SLE15
>>>>
>>>>> Let me try to
>>>>> reproduce it on my machine. I assume when you reboot, the cache is still
>>>>> dirty and not clean up, am I right ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes with around 15GB of dirty data - ceph is running on top of it and
>>>> generated many random writes.
>>>>
>>>>> And which file system do you mount
>>>>> on top of the bcache device ?
>>>> XFS
>>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information. I managed to reproduce a similar deadlock on
>>> my small box. Let me see how to fix it and post a new version ASAP :-)
>>
>> Great!
>
> Any news on this already?
I am testing the new version, and it also requires other patches I
posted earlier for 4.19 (which gets rid of bch_register_lock in
writeback thread).
Hope I can make it today :-)
Coly Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-26 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-24 4:03 [PATCH v2] bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle Coly Li
2018-07-24 7:16 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-24 8:28 ` Coly Li
2018-07-24 8:33 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-24 16:36 ` Coly Li
2018-07-25 6:16 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-26 5:44 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-26 7:04 ` Coly Li [this message]
[not found] ` <CAJ+L6qcyR2nqdTJAPwi_hKx+BtDjzX+K0guJJK7xLtBU0w64eg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-15 4:07 ` Coly Li
2018-12-15 4:22 ` Michael Lyle
2018-12-15 4:37 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34bd9a21-07bf-6613-0030-34184134b465@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox