Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:16:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f7590a8-231c-bc4b-ce56-86268639e648@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51f1f94f-f844-857e-2e2b-514a5d0780fe@suse.de>

Am 24.07.2018 um 18:36 schrieb Coly Li:
> On 2018/7/24 4:33 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Coly Li:
>>> On 2018/7/24 3:16 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> Am 24.07.2018 um 06:03 schrieb Coly Li:
>>>>> Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
>>>>> allows the writeback rate to be faster if there is no I/O request on a
>>>>> bcache device. It works well if there is only one bcache device attached
>>>>> to the cache set. If there are many bcache devices attached to a cache
>>>>> set, it may introduce performance regression because multiple faster
>>>>> writeback threads of the idle bcache devices will compete the btree level
>>>>> locks with the bcache device who have I/O requests coming.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the above issue by only permitting fast writebac when
>>>>> all bcache devices attached on the cache set are idle. And if one of the
>>>>> bcache devices has new I/O request coming, minimized all writeback
>>>>> throughput immediately and let PI controller __update_writeback_rate()
>>>>> to decide the upcoming writeback rate for each bcache device.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also when all bcache devices are idle, limited wrieback rate to a small
>>>>> number is wast of thoughput, especially when backing devices are slower
>>>>> non-rotation devices (e.g. SATA SSD). This patch sets a max writeback
>>>>> rate for each backing device if the whole cache set is idle. A faster
>>>>> writeback rate in idle time means new I/Os may have more available space
>>>>> for dirty data, and people may observe a better write performance then.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note bcache may change its cache mode in run time, and this patch
>>>>> still works if the cache mode is switched from writeback mode and there
>>>>> is still dirty data on cache.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.16+
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
>>>>> Tested-by: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
>>>>> Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
>>>>> Cc: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Coly,
>>>>
>>>> i'm still experiencing the same bug as yesterday while rebooting every
>>>> two times i get a deadlock in cache_set_free.
>>>>
>>>> Sadly it's so late ion the shutdown process that netconsole is already
>>>> unloaded or at least i get no messages from while it happens. The traces
>>>> look the same like yesterday.
>>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> Do you use the v2 patch on latest SLE15 kernel source?
>>
>> Yes - i use the kernel code from here:
>> https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel-source/commits/SLE15
>>
>>> Let me try to
>>> reproduce it on my machine. I assume when you reboot, the cache is still
>>> dirty and not clean up, am I right ?
>>
>> Yes with around 15GB of dirty data - ceph is running on top of it and
>> generated many random writes.
>>
>>> And which file system do you mount
>>> on top of the bcache device ?
>> XFS
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Thanks for the information. I managed to reproduce a similar deadlock on
> my small box. Let me see how to fix it and post a new version ASAP :-)

Great!

> 
> Coly Li
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-25  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-24  4:03 [PATCH v2] bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle Coly Li
2018-07-24  7:16 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-24  8:28   ` Coly Li
2018-07-24  8:33     ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-24 16:36       ` Coly Li
2018-07-25  6:16         ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2018-07-26  5:44           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2018-07-26  7:04             ` Coly Li
     [not found] ` <CAJ+L6qcyR2nqdTJAPwi_hKx+BtDjzX+K0guJJK7xLtBU0w64eg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-15  4:07   ` Coly Li
2018-12-15  4:22     ` Michael Lyle
2018-12-15  4:37       ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f7590a8-231c-bc4b-ce56-86268639e648@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox