From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Suwan Kim <suwan.kim027@gmail.com>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
"dongli.zhang@oracle.com" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"elliott@hpe.com" <elliott@hpe.com>
Cc: "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] virtio-blk: support polling I/O
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 19:32:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407c7563-dc29-f204-79ea-75652c0e3b85@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406153207.163134-2-suwan.kim027@gmail.com>
On 4/6/22 08:32, Suwan Kim wrote:
> This patch supports polling I/O via virtio-blk driver. Polling
> feature is enabled by module parameter "poll_queues" and it sets
> dedicated polling queues for virtio-blk. This patch improves the
> polling I/O throughput and latency.
>
> The virtio-blk driver doesn't not have a poll function and a poll
> queue and it has been operating in interrupt driven method even if
> the polling function is called in the upper layer.
>
> virtio-blk polling is implemented upon 'batched completion' of block
> layer. virtblk_poll() queues completed request to io_comp_batch->req_list
> and later, virtblk_complete_batch() calls unmap function and ends
> the requests in batch.
>
> virtio-blk reads the number of poll queues from module parameter
> "poll_queues". If VM sets queue parameter as below,
> ("num-queues=N" [QEMU property], "poll_queues=M" [module parameter])
> It allocates N virtqueues to virtio_blk->vqs[N] and it uses [0..(N-M-1)]
> as default queues and [(N-M)..(N-1)] as poll queues. Unlike the default
> queues, the poll queues have no callback function.
>
> Regarding HW-SW queue mapping, the default queue mapping uses the
> existing method that condsiders MSI irq vector. But the poll queue
> doesn't have an irq, so it uses the regular blk-mq cpu mapping.
>
> For verifying the improvement, I did Fio polling I/O performance test
> with io_uring engine with the options below.
> (io_uring, hipri, randread, direct=1, bs=512, iodepth=64 numjobs=N)
> I set 4 vcpu and 4 virtio-blk queues - 2 default queues and 2 poll
> queues for VM.
>
> As a result, IOPS and average latency improved about 10%.
>
> Test result:
>
> - Fio io_uring poll without virtio-blk poll support
> -- numjobs=1 : IOPS = 339K, avg latency = 188.33us
> -- numjobs=2 : IOPS = 367K, avg latency = 347.33us
> -- numjobs=4 : IOPS = 383K, avg latency = 682.06us
>
> - Fio io_uring poll with virtio-blk poll support
> -- numjobs=1 : IOPS = 385K, avg latency = 165.94us
> -- numjobs=2 : IOPS = 408K, avg latency = 313.28us
> -- numjobs=4 : IOPS = 424K, avg latency = 613.05us
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suwan Kim <suwan.kim027@gmail.com>
> ---
>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 15:32 [PATCH v6 0/2] virtio-blk: support polling I/O and mq_ops->queue_rqs() Suwan Kim
2022-04-06 15:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] virtio-blk: support polling I/O Suwan Kim
2022-04-07 19:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-04-06 15:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] virtio-blk: support mq_ops->queue_rqs() Suwan Kim
2022-04-07 19:33 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-04-07 19:36 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] virtio-blk: support polling I/O and mq_ops->queue_rqs() Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-04-08 15:02 ` Suwan Kim
2022-04-11 23:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-05-18 13:20 ` Suwan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407c7563-dc29-f204-79ea-75652c0e3b85@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=suwan.kim027@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox