Re: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: Use a pointer for sbitmap

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 27/11/2019 01:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Would be interesting to check the generated code for that, ideally we'd
>>> get rid of the extra load for that case, even if it is in the same
>>> cacheline.
>>>
>> I checked the disassembly and we still have the load instead of the add.
>>
>> This is not surprising, as the compiler would not know for certain that
>> we point to a field within the same struct. But at least we still should
>> point to a close memory.
>>
>> Note that the pointer could be dropped, which would remove the load, but
>> then we have many if-elses which could be slower, not to mention that
>> the blk-mq-tag code deals in bitmap pointers anyway.

Hi Jens,

> It might still be worthwhile to do:
> 
> if (tags->ptr == &tags->__default)
> 	foo(&tags->__default);
> 
> to make it clear, as that branch will predict easily. 

Not sure. So this code does produce the same assembly, as we still need 
to do the tags->ptr load for the comparison.

And then if you consider blk_mq_get_tags() as an example, there is no 
other hot value available to indicate whether the shared tags are used 
to decide whether to use  &tags->__default.

I'll consider it more.

If if can be done
> in a nice enough fashion and not sprinkled everywhere, in some fashion.
> 
> Should be testable, though.
> 
> -- Jens Axboe

Thanks,
John