Re: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: Use a pointer for sbitmap

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 26/11/2019 17:11, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/26/19 9:54 AM, John Garry wrote:
>> On 26/11/2019 15:14, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 11/26/19 2:14 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> Instead of allocating the tag bitmap in place we should be using a
>>>> pointer. This is in preparation for shared host-wide bitmaps.
>>>
>>> Not a huge fan of this, it's an extra indirection in the hot path
>>> of both submission and completion.
>>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Thanks for having a look.
>>
>> I checked the disassembly for blk_mq_get_tag() as a sample - which I
>> assume is one hot path function which you care about - and the cost of
>> the indirection is a load instruction instead of an add, denoted by ***,
>> below:
> 

Hi Jens,

> I'm not that worried about an extra instruction, my worry is the extra
> load is from different memory. When it's embedded in the struct, we're
> on the same cache line or adjacent.

Right, so the earlier iteration of this series kept the embedded struct 
and we simply pointed at that, so I wouldn't expect a caching issue of 
different memory in that case.

Cheers,
John