From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, dlemoal@kernel.org, kch@nvidia.com,
johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
bvanassche@acm.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, wozizhi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] null_blk: serialize configfs attribute shows with the file-scope lock
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 18:01:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53969d40-04c9-43a1-b1ae-512ff4a201c3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709100452.3520482-10-wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>
On 7/9/26 3:34 PM, Zizhi Wo wrote:
> The _show callback in the NULLB_DEVICE_ATTR macro reads dev->NAME and the
> _store path writes it. configfs does not serialize accesses across separate
> open file descriptions (buffer->mutex is per-fd), and _show takes no lock,
> so a concurrent read and write on the same attribute is a data race. The
> _show readers also race against writes to these fields that run after the
> configfs item becomes visible, e.g. in nullb_update_nr_hw_queues().
>
> All of those writers now run under the file-scope lock: _store takes it
> unconditionally, and the setup-side writers run under power_store() which
> holds the same lock. The only remaining unsynchronized accesses are the
> plain reads in _show. Rather than annotating every field with
> READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() across files, simply take the file-scope lock in
> _show (and in power_show) as well. This closes the remaining _show-vs-write
> data races with a single lock and keeps the writers as plain assignments.
>
> configfs attribute access is not on the I/O hot path, so taking the mutex
> in _show is acceptable from a performance standpoint. The dev fields
> written in null_alloc_dev() and dev->power in nullb_group_drop_item() need
> no locking: the former runs from .make_group before the item is published,
> and the latter is serialized by configfs frag_sem/frag_dead against
> attribute show/store.
>
> Suggested-by: Nilay Shroff<nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo<wozizhi@huawei.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 10:04 [PATCH V4 0/9] null_blk: fix init/exit races and memleaks Zizhi Wo
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 1/9] null_blk: use DEFINE_MUTEX for the file-scope mutex Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:35 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 2/9] null_blk: register configfs subsystem after creating default devices Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:36 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 3/9] null_blk: move unregister_blkdev() after destroying dev in null_exit() Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:36 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 4/9] null_blk: free global tag_set on init error path Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 5/9] null_blk: free zones array on device power-off Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 14:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 6/9] null_blk: clean up null_del_dev() to use cached dev pointer Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 13:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 7/9] null_blk: reject per-device queue resize for shared tag set Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:34 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 8/9] null_blk: serialize configfs attribute stores with device setup Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:30 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-09 10:04 ` [PATCH V4 9/9] null_blk: serialize configfs attribute shows with the file-scope lock Zizhi Wo
2026-07-10 12:31 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53969d40-04c9-43a1-b1ae-512ff4a201c3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wozizhi@huawei.com \
--cc=wozizhi@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox