From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] rbd: Enable lock context analysis
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 12:46:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83968777-6f3a-4c21-ac89-fe9ebcbf254d@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487841d2-9d55-4873-ab6b-dbd94aa7bb71@linux.ibm.com>
On 8/3/26 7:03 AM, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> In addition to the above annotations, it looks like several variables
> and structure members
> are consistently protected by specific locks:
>
> 1. rbd_dev_list is guarded by rbd_dev_list_lock.
> 2. rbd_client_list is guarded by rbd_client_list_lock.
> 3. rbd_device::acquiring_list and rbd_device::running_list are guarded by
> rbd_device::lock_lists_lock.
> 4. rbd_device::object_map is guarded by rbd_device::object_map_lock.
> 5. rbd_device::watch_cookie, rbd_device::watch_state, and
> rbd_device::watch_handle
> are guarded by rbd_device::watch_mutex.
> 6. rbd_device::lock_state and rbd_device::lock_cookie are guarded by
> rbd_device::lock_rwsem.
>
> So I think we should add the corresponding `__guarded_by(...)`
> annotations for these
> fields as part of enabling lock context analysis for this driver.
Hi Nilay,
Thank you for having looked this up. I took a closer look at the rbd
driver and came up with the patch below. Some observations:
- Some code obtains pointers to acquiring_list, running_list and
object_map before the corresponding synchronization objects are
acquired. Hence, I have not tried to annotate these struct members
with __guarded_by().
- The locking convention followed by rbd_img_object_requests() is not
a good fit for what Clang supports.
Further feedback is welcome.
Thanks,
Bart.
These are the changes I came up with (relative to the above patch):
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index f0f7a94e3e3e..4c9f566b7a91 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -406,26 +406,26 @@ struct rbd_device {
struct mutex watch_mutex;
enum rbd_watch_state watch_state;
struct ceph_osd_linger_request *watch_handle;
- u64 watch_cookie;
+ u64 watch_cookie __guarded_by(&watch_mutex);
struct delayed_work watch_dwork;
struct rw_semaphore lock_rwsem;
- enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
- char lock_cookie[32];
+ enum rbd_lock_state lock_state __guarded_by(&lock_rwsem);
+ char lock_cookie[32] __guarded_by(&lock_rwsem);
struct rbd_client_id owner_cid;
struct work_struct acquired_lock_work;
struct work_struct released_lock_work;
struct delayed_work lock_dwork;
struct work_struct unlock_work;
spinlock_t lock_lists_lock;
- struct list_head acquiring_list;
- struct list_head running_list;
+ struct list_head acquiring_list; /* __guarded_by(&lock) */
+ struct list_head running_list; /* __guarded_by(&lock) */
struct completion acquire_wait;
int acquire_err;
struct completion quiescing_wait;
spinlock_t object_map_lock;
- u8 *object_map;
+ u8 *object_map; /*__guarded_by(&object_map_lock)*/
u64 object_map_size; /* in objects */
u64 object_map_flags;
@@ -464,11 +464,13 @@ enum rbd_dev_flags {
static DEFINE_MUTEX(client_mutex); /* Serialize client creation */
-static LIST_HEAD(rbd_dev_list); /* devices */
+/* devices */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rbd_dev_list_lock);
+static __guarded_by(&rbd_dev_list_lock) LIST_HEAD(rbd_dev_list);
-static LIST_HEAD(rbd_client_list); /* clients */
+/* clients */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rbd_client_list_lock);
+static __guarded_by(&rbd_client_list_lock) LIST_HEAD(rbd_client_list);
/* Slab caches for frequently-allocated structures */
@@ -521,6 +523,7 @@ static bool rbd_is_snap(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
}
static bool __rbd_is_lock_owner(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold_shared(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
@@ -1645,6 +1648,7 @@ static void __rbd_object_map_index(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev, u64 objno,
}
static u8 __rbd_object_map_get(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, u64 objno)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->object_map_lock)
{
u64 index;
u8 shift;
@@ -1655,6 +1659,7 @@ static u8 __rbd_object_map_get(struct rbd_device
*rbd_dev, u64 objno)
}
static void __rbd_object_map_set(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, u64
objno, u8 val)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->object_map_lock)
{
u64 index;
u8 shift;
@@ -3431,6 +3436,7 @@ static bool need_exclusive_lock(struct
rbd_img_request *img_req)
}
static bool rbd_lock_add_request(struct rbd_img_request *img_req)
+ __must_hold_shared(&img_req->rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = img_req->rbd_dev;
bool locked;
@@ -3448,6 +3454,7 @@ static bool rbd_lock_add_request(struct
rbd_img_request *img_req)
}
static void rbd_lock_del_request(struct rbd_img_request *img_req)
+ __must_hold_shared(&img_req->rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = img_req->rbd_dev;
bool need_wakeup = false;
@@ -3472,6 +3479,8 @@ static int rbd_img_exclusive_lock(struct
rbd_img_request *img_req)
if (!need_exclusive_lock(img_req))
return 1;
+ __assume_ctx_lock(&img_req->rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
+
if (rbd_lock_add_request(img_req))
return 1;
@@ -3490,6 +3499,12 @@ static void rbd_img_object_requests(struct
rbd_img_request *img_req)
struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req;
rbd_assert(!img_req->pending.result && !img_req->pending.num_pending);
+ /*
+ * The caller either obtains an exclusive lock or obtains
+ * rbd_dev->lock_rwsem. Since this cannot be represented accurately
+ * using lock context annotations, add an __assume_ctx_lock() statement.
+ */
+ __assume_ctx_lock(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem);
rbd_assert(!need_exclusive_lock(img_req) ||
__rbd_is_lock_owner(rbd_dev));
@@ -3533,6 +3548,7 @@ static void rbd_img_object_requests(struct
rbd_img_request *img_req)
}
static bool rbd_img_advance(struct rbd_img_request *img_req, int *result)
+ __must_hold(&img_req->state_mutex)
{
int ret;
@@ -3651,6 +3667,7 @@ static struct rbd_client_id rbd_get_cid(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev)
*/
static void rbd_set_owner_cid(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
const struct rbd_client_id *cid)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
dout("%s rbd_dev %p %llu-%llu -> %llu-%llu\n", __func__, rbd_dev,
rbd_dev->owner_cid.gid, rbd_dev->owner_cid.handle,
@@ -3666,6 +3683,7 @@ static void format_lock_cookie(struct rbd_device
*rbd_dev, char *buf)
}
static void __rbd_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, const char *cookie)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct rbd_client_id cid = rbd_get_cid(rbd_dev);
@@ -3679,6 +3697,7 @@ static void __rbd_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
const char *cookie)
* lock_rwsem must be held for write
*/
static int rbd_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
char cookie[32];
@@ -3702,6 +3721,7 @@ static int rbd_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
* lock_rwsem must be held for write
*/
static void rbd_unlock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
int ret;
@@ -3840,6 +3860,7 @@ static int rbd_request_lock(struct rbd_device
*rbd_dev)
* (i.e. "rbd map").
*/
static void wake_lock_waiters(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int result)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct rbd_img_request *img_req;
@@ -3950,6 +3971,7 @@ static struct ceph_locker
*get_lock_owner_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
static int find_watcher(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
const struct ceph_locker *locker)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = &rbd_dev->rbd_client->client->osdc;
struct ceph_watch_item *watchers;
@@ -3999,6 +4021,7 @@ static int find_watcher(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev,
* lock_rwsem must be held for write
*/
static int rbd_try_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
struct ceph_client *client = rbd_dev->rbd_client->client;
struct ceph_locker *locker, *refreshed_locker;
@@ -4217,6 +4240,7 @@ static void rbd_pre_release_action(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev)
}
static void __rbd_release_lock(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
rbd_assert(list_empty(&rbd_dev->running_list));
@@ -4256,6 +4280,7 @@ static void rbd_release_lock_work(struct
work_struct *work)
}
static void maybe_kick_acquire(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __must_hold_shared(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem)
{
bool have_requests;
@@ -5302,6 +5327,7 @@ static void rbd_spec_free(struct kref *kref)
}
static void rbd_dev_free(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
+ __context_unsafe(cleanup function that does not need locking)
{
WARN_ON(rbd_dev->watch_state != RBD_WATCH_STATE_UNREGISTERED);
WARN_ON(rbd_dev->lock_state != RBD_LOCK_STATE_UNLOCKED);
@@ -5338,6 +5364,7 @@ static void rbd_dev_release(struct device *dev)
}
static struct rbd_device *__rbd_dev_create(struct rbd_spec *spec)
+ __context_unsafe(initialization function that does not need locking)
{
struct rbd_device *rbd_dev;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 19:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Enable lock context analysis in drivers/block/ Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] aoe: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 12:53 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 17:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-04 5:09 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] loop: Remove the "bool global" function argument Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 13:05 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 17:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-04 6:53 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] loop: Add lock context annotations Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 13:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-04 7:02 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mtip32: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 13:16 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] nbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 13:26 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 18:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-04 7:10 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-04 9:25 ` Marco Elver
2026-08-04 11:27 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] null_blk: " Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 13:35 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-04 7:40 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] rbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 14:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-03 19:46 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-08-04 10:48 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-08-04 18:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-06 9:27 ` Marco Elver
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] ublk: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] xen-blkback: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] zram: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] rnbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-07-30 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] block: Enable lock context analysis for all block drivers Bart Van Assche
2026-08-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Enable lock context analysis in drivers/block/ Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83968777-6f3a-4c21-ac89-fe9ebcbf254d@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox