From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq-sched: don't run the queue async from blk_mq_try_issue_directly()
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:51:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c6575ff-cb42-ce3a-313f-87f2e197d7f1@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314174837.GB2352@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
On 03/14/2017 11:48 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:57:50AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> If we have scheduling enabled, we jump directly to insert-and-run.
>> That's fine, but we run the queue async and we don't pass in information
>> on whether we can block from this context or not. Fixup both these
>> cases.
>
> Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>
> Just one question: we call blk_mq_get_driver_tag() with wait=false in
> blk_mq_try_issue_directly(). Should we change that to wait=can_block?
> Maybe it's pointless to try a direct issue if we'd have to wait for a
> tag anyways, though.
Exactly, don't want to wait for a tag, at that point we are just
pointlessly stalling an app that could perhaps be submitting more IO.
So I don't think we should factor that in here, better to let the
blocking vs non-blocking drivers behave the same in that regard.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-14 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-14 14:57 [PATCH] blk-mq-sched: don't run the queue async from blk_mq_try_issue_directly() Jens Axboe
2017-03-14 15:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-14 15:26 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-14 17:48 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-03-14 17:51 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c6575ff-cb42-ce3a-313f-87f2e197d7f1@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox