From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:51:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d31f634-90e0-efc3-394e-37ce0515c836@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420124213.5wc4umnjrlvu6zbi@shindev>
在 2022/04/20 20:42, Shinichiro Kawasaki 写道:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jens has merged Yu Kuai's fix[1], so I think it won't be triggered now.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-5.18&id=a87c29e1a85e64b28445bb1e80505230bf2e3b4b
>
> Hi Ming, I applied the patch above on top of v5.18-rc3 and ran block/002.
> Unfortunately, it failed with a new symptom with KASAN use-after-free [2]. I
> ran block/002 with linux-block/block-5.18 branch tip with git hash a87c29e1a85e
> and got the same KASAN uaf. Reverting the patch from the linux-block/block-5.18
> branch, the KASAN uaf disappears (Still block/002 fails). Regarding block/002,
> it looks the patch made the failure symptom worse.
>
> [2]
>
> [ 466.424358] run blktests block/002 at 2022-04-20 19:44:02
> [ 466.508847] scsi_debug:sdebug_driver_probe: scsi_debug: trim poll_queues to 0. poll_q/nr_hw = (0/1)
> [ 466.518617] scsi host7: scsi_debug: version 0191 [20210520]
> dev_size_mb=8, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0
> [ 466.535080] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access Linux scsi_debug 0191 PQ: 0 ANSI: 7
> [ 466.548701] sd 7:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred
> [ 466.549819] sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg9 type 0
> [ 466.557985] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] 16384 512-byte logical blocks: (8.39 MB/8.00 MiB)
> [ 466.570116] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Write Protect is off
> [ 466.575644] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Mode Sense: 73 00 10 08
> [ 466.577821] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and FUA
> [ 466.590343] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Optimal transfer size 524288 bytes
> [ 466.645516] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Attached SCSI disk
> [ 467.438285] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdi] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> [ 467.458790] ==================================================================
> [ 467.466714] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x396b/0x5030
> [ 467.473951] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888104e05248 by task check/1549
>
> [ 467.483373] CPU: 1 PID: 1549 Comm: check Not tainted 5.18.0-rc3+ #24
> [ 467.490426] Hardware name: Supermicro X10SLL-F/X10SLL-F, BIOS 3.0 04/24/2015
> [ 467.498164] Call Trace:
> [ 467.501313] <TASK>
> [ 467.504120] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
> [ 467.508488] print_report.cold+0x5e/0x5db
> [ 467.513205] ? __lock_acquire+0x396b/0x5030
> [ 467.518092] kasan_report+0xbf/0xf0
> [ 467.522288] ? lockdep_lock+0x30/0x1a0
> [ 467.526738] ? __lock_acquire+0x396b/0x5030
> [ 467.531630] __lock_acquire+0x396b/0x5030
> [ 467.536346] ? lockdep_unlock+0xf2/0x240
> [ 467.540970] ? __lock_acquire+0x23db/0x5030
> [ 467.545861] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410
> [ 467.551705] lock_acquire+0x19a/0x4b0
> [ 467.556068] ? lockref_get+0x9/0x40
> [ 467.560264] ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0
> [ 467.564806] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
> [ 467.569693] ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
> [ 467.574316] ? lock_release+0x3a7/0x6c0
> [ 467.578856] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
> [ 467.583222] ? lockref_get+0x9/0x40
> [ 467.587414] lockref_get+0x9/0x40
> [ 467.591439] simple_recursive_removal+0x36/0x7e0
> [ 467.596758] ? debugfs_remove+0x60/0x60
> [ 467.601300] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x1f0
> [ 467.606278] debugfs_remove+0x40/0x60
> [ 467.610643] blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_queue_rqos+0x34/0x70
> [ 467.616919] rq_qos_exit+0x1b/0xf0
> [ 467.621028] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170
> [ 467.625740] blk_cleanup_queue+0xfd/0x1f0
> [ 467.630449] __scsi_remove_device+0xdd/0x2b0
> [ 467.635422] sdev_store_delete+0x83/0x120
> [ 467.640137] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x353/0x520
> [ 467.645287] new_sync_write+0x2d9/0x500
> [ 467.649827] ? new_sync_read+0x500/0x500
> [ 467.654455] ? perf_msr_probe+0x1f0/0x280
> [ 467.659170] ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0
> [ 467.663709] ? inode_security+0x54/0xf0
> [ 467.668253] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
> [ 467.673144] vfs_write+0x61c/0x910
> [ 467.677250] ksys_write+0xe3/0x1a0
> [ 467.681355] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xa0/0xa0
> [ 467.685982] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70
> [ 467.691740] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> [ 467.696018] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [ 467.701772] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d0b701817
> [ 467.706046] Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> [ 467.725492] RSP: 002b:00007ffd37a645e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> [ 467.733762] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f2d0b701817
> [ 467.741596] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a23ecf4630 RDI: 0000000000000001
> [ 467.749431] RBP: 000055a23ecf4630 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f2d0b7b64e0
> [ 467.757267] R10: 00007f2d0b7b63e0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
> [ 467.765101] R13: 00007f2d0b7fb5a0 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007f2d0b7fb7a0
> [ 467.772945] </TASK>
>
> [ 467.778033] Allocated by task 111:
> [ 467.782141] kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
> [ 467.786681] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x90/0xc0
> [ 467.791395] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x258/0x720
> [ 467.796457] __d_alloc+0x31/0x960
> [ 467.800477] d_alloc+0x44/0x200
> [ 467.804326] d_alloc_parallel+0xca/0x1490
> [ 467.809041] __lookup_slow+0x17f/0x3d0
> [ 467.813495] lookup_one_len+0x10b/0x130
> [ 467.818038] start_creating.part.0+0xf0/0x220
> [ 467.823098] debugfs_create_dir+0x2f/0x460
> [ 467.827901] blk_mq_debugfs_register_rqos+0x1fe/0x330
Hi,
Sorry that I missed the 'q->rqos_debugfs_dir' which is created under
'q->debugfs_dir'.
Ming, do you think move blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_queue_rqos() to
blk_unregister_queue() is okay?
Thanks,
Kuai
> [ 467.833655] wbt_init+0x35e/0x630
> [ 467.837676] blk_register_queue+0x26c/0x430
> [ 467.842565] device_add_disk+0x639/0xd90
> [ 467.847192] sd_probe+0x93f/0xf50
> [ 467.851212] really_probe+0x3d7/0xa10
> [ 467.855581] __driver_probe_device+0x2ab/0x460
> [ 467.860721] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
> [ 467.865610] __device_attach_driver+0x191/0x240
> [ 467.870845] bus_for_each_drv+0x119/0x180
> [ 467.875560] __device_attach_async_helper+0x172/0x210
> [ 467.881314] async_run_entry_fn+0x95/0x500
> [ 467.886115] process_one_work+0x7cf/0x12d0
> [ 467.890915] worker_thread+0x5ac/0xec0
> [ 467.895369] kthread+0x2a7/0x350
> [ 467.899305] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 4:59 [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20 7:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-04-20 9:34 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 12:42 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20 15:05 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 22:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-21 0:02 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21 8:38 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 12:04 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21 8:51 ` yukuai (C) [this message]
2022-04-21 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 11:14 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d31f634-90e0-efc3-394e-37ce0515c836@huawei.com \
--to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox