From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:38:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmEYEYdO4SkNv0lc@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421000247.lrwqgzolwpbeuwow@shindev>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:02:48AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2022 / 23:05, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:42:14PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > On Apr 20, 2022 / 17:34, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 01:59:11PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > > > The test case block/002 checks that device removal during blktrace run
> > > > > does not leak debugfs directory. The Linux kernel commit 0a9a25ca7843
> > > > > ("block: let blkcg_gq grab request queue's refcnt") triggered failure of
> > > > > the test case. The commit delayed queue release and debugfs directory
> > > > > removal then the test case checks directory existence too early. To
> > > > > avoid this false-positive failure, delay the directory existence check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > tests/block/002 | 1 +
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tests/block/002 b/tests/block/002
> > > > > index 9b183e7..8061c91 100755
> > > > > --- a/tests/block/002
> > > > > +++ b/tests/block/002
> > > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ test() {
> > > > > echo "debugfs directory deleted with blktrace active"
> > > > > fi
> > > > > { kill $!; wait; } >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> > > > > + sleep 0.5
> > > > > if [[ -d /sys/kernel/debug/block/${SCSI_DEBUG_DEVICES[0]} ]]; then
> > > > > echo "debugfs directory leaked"
> > > > > fi
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Jens has merged Yu Kuai's fix[1], so I think it won't be triggered now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-5.18&id=a87c29e1a85e64b28445bb1e80505230bf2e3b4b
> > >
> > > Hi Ming, I applied the patch above on top of v5.18-rc3 and ran block/002.
> > > Unfortunately, it failed with a new symptom with KASAN use-after-free [2]. I
> > > ran block/002 with linux-block/block-5.18 branch tip with git hash a87c29e1a85e
> > > and got the same KASAN uaf. Reverting the patch from the linux-block/block-5.18
> > > branch, the KASAN uaf disappears (Still block/002 fails). Regarding block/002,
> > > it looks the patch made the failure symptom worse.
> >
> > Hi Shinichiro,
> >
> > Looks Yu Kuai's patch has other problem, can you drop that patch and
> > apply & test the attached patch?
>
> Sure. With the patch, kernel message is clean. But I still observe the test case
> failure:
>
> block/002 (remove a device while running blktrace) [failed]
> runtime 1.276s ... 1.241s
> --- tests/block/002.out 2022-04-14 11:29:04.760295898 +0900
> +++ /home/shin/blktests/results/nodev/block/002.out.bad 2022-04-21 08:40:01.776511887 +0900
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> Running block/002
> +debugfs directory deleted with blktrace active
> Test complete
Hi Shinichiro,
Thanks for your test, and the above issue has been addressed in the
latest post:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220421083431.2917311-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/T/#u
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 4:59 [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20 7:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-04-20 9:34 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 12:42 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20 15:05 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 22:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-21 0:02 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21 8:38 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-04-21 12:04 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21 8:51 ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-21 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 11:14 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmEYEYdO4SkNv0lc@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox