From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Kun Hu <huk23@m.fudan.edu.cn>,
Jiaji Qin <jjtan24@m.fudan.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: don't call vfs_flush() with queue frozen
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:21:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4dwFFIb6gjAa4wd@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4deHFfJ2qC8VHjT@infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:05:00PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:37:08AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Actually some FSs may call kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) with i_rwsem grabbed,
> > which could call into real deadlock if IO on the loop disk is caused by
> > the kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL).
>
> Well, loop can always deadlock when the lower fs is doing allocations,
> even without the freeze. I'm actually kinda surprised loop doesn't
> force a context noio as we'd really need that.
Loop does call mapping_set_gfp_mask(~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS)).
>
> > > > because we're talking about different file systems instances. The only
> > > > exception would be file systems taking global locks in the I/O path,
> > > > but I sincerely hope no one does that.
> > >
> > > Didn't you see the report on fs_reclaim and sysfs root lock?
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/197b07435a736825ab40dab8d91db031c7fce37e.camel@linux.intel.com/
> >
> > There are more, such as mm->mmap_lock[1], hfs SB 'cat_tree' lock[2]...
> >
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/67863050.050a0220.216c54.006f.GAE@google.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/67582202.050a0220.a30f1.01cb.GAE@google.com/
>
> And all of these are caused by not breaking the dependency loop..
Can you share how to break the dependency? Such as fs_reclaim &
mm->mmap_lock.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 2:24 [PATCH] loop: don't call vfs_flush() with queue frozen Ming Lei
2025-01-13 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 8:22 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 9:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 15:07 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 2:37 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-15 8:21 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-15 9:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-14 3:21 ` Kun Hu
2025-02-18 5:39 ` Kun Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4dwFFIb6gjAa4wd@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=huk23@m.fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=jjtan24@m.fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox