From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Marc Smith <msmith626@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: flush the disk cache on BLKFLSBUF
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:49:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJsFIkpj/+CdrQ1W@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9e830ef-adf7-4196-a46f-ba4e65cbb54d@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 05:31:12PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Marc Smith reported a bug where he wrote to the dm-writecache target using
> O_DIRECT, then reset the machine without proper shutdown and the freshly
> written data were lost. It turned out that he didn't use the fsync or
> fdatasync syscall (and dm-writecache makes its metadata persistent on a
> FLUSH bio).
Which so far is expected. Even with O_DIRECT you need O_(D)SYNC or
fsync/fdatasync to persist data.
> When I was analyzing this issue, it turned out that there is no easy way
> how to send the FLUSH bio to a block device from a command line.
xfs_io -c fsync /dev/foo
> The "blockdev --flushbufs" command also doesn't send the FLUSH bio, but I
> would expect it to send it. Without sending the FLUSH bio, "blockdev
> --flushbufs" doesn't really guarantee anything.
I wouldn't expect it. It's a really weird legacy thing that calls
back up into the file system, but only if it sets s_bdev to this
device. I don't think we should add new users of it that overload the
semantics.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 20:25 [PATCH] block: flush the disk cache on BLKFLSBUF Mikulas Patocka
2023-06-27 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-27 15:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2023-06-27 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJsFIkpj/+CdrQ1W@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=msmith626@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox