From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:56:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoFkFB8Fcw5gCDln@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zn2cuwpM+/dK/682@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:09:15AM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> When I say "behavior A + 2," I mean behavior A and behavior 2 at the
> same time on the same ublk device. I still think this is not supported
> with current ublk_drv, see below.
>
> > > the ublk server can "handle" the I/O error because during this time,
> > > there is no ublk server and all decisions on how to handle I/O are made
> > > by ublk_drv directly (based on configuration flags specified when the
> > > device was created).
> > >
> > > If the ublk server created the device with UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, then
> > > when the ublk server has crashed (and not restarted yet), I/Os issued by
> > > the application will queue/hang until the ublk server comes back and
> > > recovers the device, because the underlying request_queue is left in a
> > > quiesced state. So in this case, behavior A is not possible.
> >
> > When ublk server is crashed, ublk_abort_requests() will be called to fail
> > queued inflight requests. Meantime ubq->canceling is set to requeue
> > new request instead of forwarding it to ublk server.
> >
> > So behavior A should be supported easily by failing request in
> > ublk_queue_rq() if ubq->canceling is set.
>
> This argument only works for devices created without
> UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY. If UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY is set, then the
> request_queue for the device is left in a quiesced state and so I/Os
> will not even get to ublk_queue_rq. See the following as proof (using a
> build of ublksrv master):
I meant that the following one-line patch may address your issue:
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 4e159948c912..a89240f4f7b0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
struct request *rq)
{
/* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
- if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq))
+ if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery_reissue(ubq))
blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
else
blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-30 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 19:44 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Uday Shankar
2024-06-18 2:00 ` Ming Lei
2024-07-23 19:32 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers Uday Shankar
2024-06-18 2:11 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-26 17:22 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-27 1:17 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-27 17:09 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-30 13:56 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-07-01 21:02 ` Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 4:07 ` Ming Lei
2024-07-02 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17 0:26 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:31 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:46 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17 0:29 ` Uday Shankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoFkFB8Fcw5gCDln@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox