public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:56:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoFkFB8Fcw5gCDln@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zn2cuwpM+/dK/682@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:09:15AM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> When I say "behavior A + 2," I mean behavior A and behavior 2 at the
> same time on the same ublk device. I still think this is not supported
> with current ublk_drv, see below.
> 
> > > the ublk server can "handle" the I/O error because during this time,
> > > there is no ublk server and all decisions on how to handle I/O are made
> > > by ublk_drv directly (based on configuration flags specified when the
> > > device was created).
> > > 
> > > If the ublk server created the device with UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, then
> > > when the ublk server has crashed (and not restarted yet), I/Os issued by
> > > the application will queue/hang until the ublk server comes back and
> > > recovers the device, because the underlying request_queue is left in a
> > > quiesced state. So in this case, behavior A is not possible.
> > 
> > When ublk server is crashed, ublk_abort_requests() will be called to fail
> > queued inflight requests. Meantime ubq->canceling is set to requeue
> > new request instead of forwarding it to ublk server.
> > 
> > So behavior A should be supported easily by failing request in
> > ublk_queue_rq() if ubq->canceling is set.
> 
> This argument only works for devices created without
> UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY. If UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY is set, then the
> request_queue for the device is left in a quiesced state and so I/Os
> will not even get to ublk_queue_rq. See the following as proof (using a
> build of ublksrv master):

I meant that the following one-line patch may address your issue:


diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 4e159948c912..a89240f4f7b0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 		struct request *rq)
 {
 	/* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
-	if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq))
+	if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery_reissue(ubq))
 		blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
 	else
 		blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-30 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-17 19:44 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Uday Shankar
2024-06-18  2:00   ` Ming Lei
2024-07-23 19:32     ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers Uday Shankar
2024-06-18  2:11   ` Ming Lei
2024-06-26 17:22     ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-27  1:17       ` Ming Lei
2024-06-27 17:09         ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-30 13:56           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-07-01 21:02             ` Uday Shankar
2024-07-02  4:07               ` Ming Lei
2024-07-02 11:09   ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17  0:26     ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:31   ` Ming Lei
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:46   ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17  0:29     ` Uday Shankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZoFkFB8Fcw5gCDln@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox