From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:07:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoN89mOKhynY/zbn@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoMZeWrQclRu2k9s@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:02:49PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:56:36PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > I meant that the following one-line patch may address your issue:
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > index 4e159948c912..a89240f4f7b0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > struct request *rq)
> > {
> > /* We cannot process this rq so just requeue it. */
> > - if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq))
> > + if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery_reissue(ubq))
> > blk_mq_requeue_request(rq, false);
> > else
> > blk_mq_end_request(rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
>
> It does not work (ran the same test from my previous email, got the same
> results), and how could it? As I've already mentioned several times, the
> root of the issue is that when UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY is set, the request
> queue remains quiesced when the server has exited. Quiescing the queue
> means that the block layer will not call the driver's queue_rq when I/Os
> are submitted. Instead the block layer will queue those I/Os internally,
> only submitting them to the driver when the queue is unquiesced, which,
> in the current ublk_drv, only happens when the device is recovered or
> deleted.
>
> Having ublk_drv return errors to I/Os issued while there is no ublk
> server requires the queue to be unquiesced. My patchset actually does
> this (see patch 4/4).
Sorry for ignoring the fact that queue is kept as quiesced after ublk
server is crashed, and I will review patch 4 soon.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 19:44 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Uday Shankar
2024-06-18 2:00 ` Ming Lei
2024-07-23 19:32 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] ublk: refactor recovery configuration flag helpers Uday Shankar
2024-06-18 2:11 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-26 17:22 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-27 1:17 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-27 17:09 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-30 13:56 ` Ming Lei
2024-07-01 21:02 ` Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 4:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-07-02 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17 0:26 ` Uday Shankar
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] ublk: merge stop_work and quiesce_work Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:31 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-17 19:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] ublk: support device recovery without I/O queueing Uday Shankar
2024-07-02 13:46 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-17 0:29 ` Uday Shankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoN89mOKhynY/zbn@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox