Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 07:33:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag-WUymW2vwVyMJB@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521190253.242065-1-kbusch@meta.com>

On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> 
> When submitting a bio to blk-mq, if the task should sleep after peeking
> a cached request, but before it pops it, the plug flushes and calls
> blk_mq_free_plug_rqs, freeing the cached_rqs. This creates a
> use-after-free bug. Fix this by popping the cached request before any
> possible blocking calls if it is suitable for use.
> 
> Popping this request first holds a queue reference, so avoid any
> serialization races with queue freezes and can safely proceed with
> dispatching that request to the driver. This potentially increases a
> timing window from when a driver wants to freeze its queue to when
> requests stop being dispatched. That scenario is off the fast path
> though, and drivers need to appropriately handle requests during a
> freeze request anyway.
> 
> The downside is the popped element needs to be individually freed when
> we performed a bio plug merge. The cached request would have had to be
> freed later anyway, but this patch does it inline with building the plug
> list instead of after flushing it.
> 
> Fixes: b0077e269f6c1 ("blk-mq: make sure active queue usage is held for bio_integrity_prep()")
> Fixes: 7b4f36cd22a65 ("block: ensure we hold a queue reference when using queue limits")
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> 
>   This pops the cached requests first. It's simpler this way and I don't
>   see any strong reason against it.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>

BTW, as mentioned in v2, the request may be added back in case of merge,
but seems not a big deal given blk_mq_free_plug_rqs() doesn't free requests
in batch.


Thanks,
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-21 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21 19:02 [PATCHv3] blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable Keith Busch
2026-05-21 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-21 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-21 23:33 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2026-05-22  1:44   ` Keith Busch
2026-05-22  4:12     ` Ming Lei
2026-05-22 22:08       ` Keith Busch
2026-05-22 22:55         ` Keith Busch
2026-05-23 13:56           ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-22  9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-22 12:23   ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ag-WUymW2vwVyMJB@fedora \
    --to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox