Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:55:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahDe25f1Dw0YBsOL@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahDT-JZZGyyTXyii@kbusch-mbp>

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 04:08:56PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 12:12:18PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 07:44:50PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 07:33:39AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > BTW, as mentioned in v2, the request may be added back in case of merge,
> > > > but seems not a big deal given blk_mq_free_plug_rqs() doesn't free requests
> > > > in batch.
> > > 
> > > We could introduce a special goto label for the merge case to push it
> > 
> > It can be done simply by replacing the added `blk_mq_free_request` with moving
> > it back to plug list.
> 
> What I'm worried about is hitting a blocking allocation, then the
> cached_rqs list is freed, leaving the current request from it the only
> one still holding a queue reference. I think we ought to re-enter the
> queue in that case.

Hmm, I may be mistaken here. The block allocation doesn't call
blk_finish_plug(), so the current plug is left intact; the other
queue_exit goto's are either from non-blocking contexts or a successful
merge that holds queue references in other ways. I guess there is no
queue_exit goto where unconditionally pushing back might be a problem.
So yeah, sorry, maybe restoring it to the cached_rqs is a worthy
optimization to make.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21 19:02 [PATCHv3] blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable Keith Busch
2026-05-21 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-21 19:05 ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-21 23:33 ` Ming Lei
2026-05-22  1:44   ` Keith Busch
2026-05-22  4:12     ` Ming Lei
2026-05-22 22:08       ` Keith Busch
2026-05-22 22:55         ` Keith Busch [this message]
2026-05-23 13:56           ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-22  9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-22 12:23   ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahDe25f1Dw0YBsOL@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox