From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] block: take i_rwsem for the direct I/O write fallback
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 14:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2082e5a-32d9-4a96-abd3-fd6ba7aa97d2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828-blkdev-fixes-v2-2-32f3f40cebed@columbia.edu>
On 8/28/26 3:49 PM, Tal Zussman wrote:
> Commit c0e473a0d226 ("block: fix race between set_blocksize and read
> paths") closed a race between set_blocksize() and block device I/O: with
> large sector size support, set_blocksize() can change i_blkbits and the
> mapping's minimum folio order while a concurrent reader still holds a
> folio of the old, smaller order, leading to crashes. In particular, it
> made blkdev_write_iter() wrap buffered writes in inode_lock_shared().
>
> However, the direct I/O fallback path was missed in that conversion.
> blkdev_write_iter() passes blkdev_buffered_write() as an argument to
> direct_write_fallback() with no lock held. A direct write that completes
> only partially then finishes as a buffered write with no protection.
>
> This can cause a BUG by racing partial direct writes against
> ioctl(BLKBSZSET). Writer threads issue O_DIRECT pwritev() with a
> two-segment iovec whose second segment is an unreadable PROT_NONE
> mapping. The direct path then writes the first segment, fails to pin the
> second, and returns short, entering the fallback. A second thread keeps
> toggling the second segment's protection so that some fallbacks get past
> fault_in_iov_iter_readable() and reach the page cache, a third thread
> populates the page cache with folios of the current block size via
> pread() and readahead(), and a fourth thread toggles the block size
> between 512 bytes and 64K with BLKBSZSET. The minimum folio order only
> moves with block sizes above PAGE_SIZE, i.e. with
> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE raising BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE to 64K.
>
> On a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM kernel this yields the following BUG:
>
> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) < mapping_min_folio_order(mapping))
> kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:858!
> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> RIP: 0010:__filemap_add_folio+0x860/0x8d0
> Call Trace:
> filemap_add_folio+0xc9/0x1f0
> __filemap_get_folio_mpol+0x240/0x660
> iomap_write_begin+0xa87/0xd70
> iomap_file_buffered_write+0x304/0x6a0
> blkdev_write_iter+0x255/0x510
> do_iter_readv_writev+0x23d/0x3c0
> vfs_writev+0x211/0x7d0
> do_pwritev+0x121/0x190
> do_syscall_64+0x121/0x630
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> The same workload also trips WARN_ON_ONCE(pos >= folio_pos(folio) +
> fsize) in iomap_trim_folio_range().
>
> Fix this by calling blkdev_buffered_write() in the fallback path under
> inode_lock_shared(), matching the plain buffered-write branch. With the
> fix the same workload runs clean.
>
> A short IOCB_NOWAIT direct write reaches the same fallback. Taking
> i_rwsem there can now block behind set_blocksize(), and the fallback
> already blocks on writeback of the data it copied in
> direct_write_fallback(). blkdev_write_iter() already rejects a purely
> buffered IOCB_NOWAIT write with -EOPNOTSUPP, so do not enter the
> fallback for IOCB_NOWAIT at all: return the bytes the direct path
> already wrote, or -EAGAIN if none, and let the caller retry.
>
> The reproducer used was written by an LLM, and is available at [1].
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/tzussman/69d06bc57d42a42989eb038b1b5aeb74
>
> Fixes: 3c20917120ce ("block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-blk-dontcache-v7-0-3e8e6850068d%40columbia.edu?part=5
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
> ---
> block/fops.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
You gotta love LLMs; no-one would have written up a testcase with
four different threads...
Anyway. There is a reproducer, so we should be fixing it.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/7] block device fixes for large block sizes, IOCB_NOWAIT, and direct I/O Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] block: use iomap_dirty_folio for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] block: take i_rwsem for the direct I/O write fallback Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:47 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] block: take i_rwsem for the splice read path Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] block: honor IOCB_NOWAIT in the block device buffered " Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 13:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] block: fail atomic writes instead of falling back to buffered I/O Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 14:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] block: unpin all pages of a bvec in bio_iov_iter_align_down() Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 14:36 ` Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 14:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] block: remove dead metadata handling from the async direct I/O path Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] block device fixes for large block sizes, IOCB_NOWAIT, and direct I/O Tal Zussman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2082e5a-32d9-4a96-abd3-fd6ba7aa97d2@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox