From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:25:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3aebd6e-9351-4235-834e-e057b2cfa0be@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624170905.3972095-4-kbusch@meta.com>
On 6/24/26 7:09 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>
> Direct I/O user pages are forwarded to the backing file unchanged, so
> the backing's DMA alignment requirement applies to them. Track the
> backing file's dio_mem_align and advertise it as the loop device's
> dma_alignment if it is larger than the default so we advertise proper
> limits and misaligned I/O is rejected early instead of being dispatched
> to the backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 310de0463beb1..5fe61d542f8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct loop_device {
>
> struct file *lo_backing_file;
> unsigned int lo_min_dio_size;
> + unsigned int lo_dio_mem_align;
> struct block_device *lo_device;
>
> gfp_t old_gfp_mask;
> @@ -447,26 +448,37 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo)
> __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, rc);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int loop_query_min_dio_size(struct loop_device *lo)
> +static void loop_update_dio_alignment(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
> struct block_device *sb_bdev = file->f_mapping->host->i_sb->s_bdev;
> struct kstat st;
>
> /*
> - * Use the minimal dio alignment of the file system if provided.
> + * Use the dio alignment of the file system if provided. The incomoing
> + * request's bio_vec is forwarded to the backing file unchanged, so its
> + * required memory alignment becomes the device's dma_alignment when
> + * used for direct-io.
> */
> if (!vfs_getattr(&file->f_path, &st, STATX_DIOALIGN, 0) &&
> - (st.result_mask & STATX_DIOALIGN))
> - return st.dio_offset_align;
> + (st.result_mask & STATX_DIOALIGN)) {
> + lo->lo_min_dio_size = st.dio_offset_align;
> + lo->lo_dio_mem_align = st.dio_mem_align - 1;
> + return;
> + }
>
> /*
> * In a perfect world this wouldn't be needed, but as of Linux 6.13 only
> * a handful of file systems support the STATX_DIOALIGN flag.
> */
> - if (sb_bdev)
> - return bdev_logical_block_size(sb_bdev);
> - return SECTOR_SIZE;
> + if (sb_bdev) {
> + lo->lo_min_dio_size = bdev_logical_block_size(sb_bdev);
> + lo->lo_dio_mem_align = bdev_dma_alignment(sb_bdev);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + lo->lo_min_dio_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
> + lo->lo_dio_mem_align = SECTOR_SIZE - 1;
> }
>
> static inline int is_loop_device(struct file *file)
> @@ -509,7 +521,7 @@ static void loop_assign_backing_file(struct loop_device *lo, struct file *file)
> lo->old_gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS));
> if (lo->lo_backing_file->f_flags & O_DIRECT)
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO;
> - lo->lo_min_dio_size = loop_query_min_dio_size(lo);
> + loop_update_dio_alignment(lo);
> }
>
> static int loop_check_backing_file(struct file *file)
> @@ -940,6 +952,19 @@ static unsigned int loop_default_blocksize(struct loop_device *lo)
> return SECTOR_SIZE;
> }
>
> +static void loop_set_dma_limit(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Direct I/O forwards the user pages to the backing file unchanged, so
> + * track the backing's DMA alignment requirement as the mode is toggled.
> + */
> + if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO)
> + lim->dma_alignment = max_t(unsigned int, lo->lo_dio_mem_align,
> + SECTOR_SIZE - 1);
> + else
> + lim->dma_alignment = SECTOR_SIZE - 1;
Nit: we never set this previously, so we could drop this line.
> +}
> +
> static void loop_update_limits(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim,
> unsigned int bsize)
> {
> @@ -961,6 +986,7 @@ static void loop_update_limits(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim,
> lim->logical_block_size = bsize;
> lim->physical_block_size = bsize;
> lim->io_min = bsize;
> + loop_set_dma_limit(lo, lim);
> lim->features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
> if (file->f_op->fsync && !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY))
> lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
> @@ -1416,6 +1442,7 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
> {
> bool use_dio = !!arg;
> unsigned int memflags;
> + struct queue_limits lim;
>
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -ENXIO;
> @@ -1434,6 +1461,9 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO;
> else
> lo->lo_flags &= ~LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO;
> + lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
> + loop_set_dma_limit(lo, &lim);
> + queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue, memflags);
> return 0;
> }
Otherwise looks good.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 17:09 [PATCH v3 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Keith Busch
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] block: use blkdev_iov_iter_get_pages status for errors Keith Busch
2026-06-25 6:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] block: fix dio leak on metadata mapping error Keith Busch
2026-06-25 6:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O Keith Busch
2026-06-25 6:25 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] zloop: set dma_alignment from the backing files " Keith Busch
2026-06-25 6:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] block: validate user space vectors during extraction Keith Busch
2026-06-25 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3aebd6e-9351-4235-834e-e057b2cfa0be@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox