* Query reagrding the MAS Instance Information Support patchset @ 2015-02-12 14:42 Gowtham Anandha Babu 2015-02-12 15:06 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Gowtham Anandha Babu @ 2015-02-12 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Luiz Augusto von Dentz'; +Cc: linux-bluetooth Hi Luiz, I have submitted a patch set to add support for MAP MAS Instance feature on the month of October. Below are the links. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/54106 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53974 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53975 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53976 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53977 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/54110 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53979 But the suggestion provided was to wait until the Multiple MAS Instance support. Why can't we implement the multiple MAS Instance support on top of this? Some fixes and cleanups are needed in the above submitted patches. I will fix that. Shall I resend the same? What do you think? Regards, Gowtham Anandha Babu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Query reagrding the MAS Instance Information Support patchset 2015-02-12 14:42 Query reagrding the MAS Instance Information Support patchset Gowtham Anandha Babu @ 2015-02-12 15:06 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz @ 2015-02-12 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gowtham Anandha Babu; +Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Gowtham, On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu <gowtham.ab@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Luiz, > > I have submitted a patch set to add support for MAP MAS Instance feature on > the month of October. Below are the links. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/54106 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53974 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53975 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53976 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53977 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/54110 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/53979 > > But the suggestion provided was to wait until the Multiple MAS Instance > support. > Why can't we implement the multiple MAS Instance support on top of this? > Some fixes and cleanups are needed in the above submitted patches. I will > fix that. > Shall I resend the same? > What do you think? I still have plans to implement the folder structure as I mentioned, this would basically mean no API changes are needed, this would conflict with your changes. I have been some patches for this already which should be ready for submission next week. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-12 15:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-02-12 14:42 Query reagrding the MAS Instance Information Support patchset Gowtham Anandha Babu 2015-02-12 15:06 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox