From: Eugene Crosser <crosser@average.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Re: Reproducible kernel oops on PPP session start
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:52:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073919178.7667.41.camel@ariel.sovam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073913755.3126.48.camel@pegasus>
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 16:22, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > Interesting that running "rfcomm bind" or "rfcomm listen" does not
> > increase l2cap's refcount. It gets increased at the moment when
> > incoming connection actually takes place. And is decreased (by 2) when
> > it terminates.
[...]
> Let us summarize this problem a little bit. We know that this is
> refcount bug and it happens in __module_get(). It also seems that we
> only get hit by this bug if we got in incoming connection. Is this
> right? Do the refcounting work correct on outgoing? My question is if
> this is a L2CAP only problem or if it only happens in conjunction with
> RFCOMM? Can you reproduce it with the l2test program only? Don't load
> the rfcomm.ko module and don't start the sdpd, so you have a better
> starting refcount.
I don't think that I have a device capable of anything but rfcomm... I
have a cellphone (can use obex that works over rfcomm) and a palm (ppp
or hotsync over rfcomm).
I'll check outgoing connections to the cellphone (obex push) and report.
I can try to get a second usb dongle and connect from another linux
machine, but that will take time to arrange.
OTOH I could throw a few printk()s into the kernel but I don't know
where to put them. The only place in l2cap.c that looks relevant to
refcount management that I can see is at line 353 -
"sk_set_owner(sk, THIS_MODULE);", but there must be other places too...
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-12 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 11:42 Reproducible kernel oops on PPP session start Eugene Crosser
2004-01-07 12:15 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-07 13:57 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-10 12:00 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-10 12:11 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-11 14:59 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-12 6:33 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-12 13:22 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-12 14:52 ` Eugene Crosser [this message]
2004-01-12 15:15 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-12 21:22 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-12 21:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-12 22:02 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-13 17:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-13 19:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-13 21:32 ` Eugene Crosser
2004-01-13 23:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-01-07 14:05 ` Edd Dumbill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073919178.7667.41.camel@ariel.sovam.com \
--to=crosser@average.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox