* Re: [PATCH] Fix 2.6.21 rfcomm lockups (2.6.21 regression)
[not found] ` <45EB0F69.5070002@rtr.ca>
@ 2007-03-05 15:33 ` Jiri Kosina
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2007-03-05 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord
Cc: Greg KH, Linux Kernel, bluez-devel, marcel, Andrew Morton,
David S. Miller
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> This patch prevents total system lockup when using rfcomm devices.
I acknowledge that this patch fixes lockup for me too.
When debugging this, I also came across a different bug (spotted by
lockdep). Is the patch below applicable?
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
[Bluetooth] Fix socket locking in hci_sock_dev_event()
hci_sock_dev_event() uses bh_lock_sock() to lock the socket lock.
This is not deadlock-safe against locking of the same socket lock in
l2cap_connect_cfm() from softirq context. In addition to that,
hci_sock_dev_event() doesn't seem to be called from softirq context,
so it is safe to use lock_sock()/release_sock() instead.
The lockdep warning can be triggered on my T42p simply by switching
the Bluetooth off by the keyboard button.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.21-rc2 #4
---------------------------------
inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> {softirq-on-W} usage.
khubd/156 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH){-+..}, at: [<e0ca5520>] hci_sock_dev_event+0xa8/0xc5 [bluetooth]
{in-softirq-W} state was registered at:
[<c012d1db>] mark_lock+0x59/0x414
[<e0cef688>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x4e/0x11f [l2cap]
[<c012dfd7>] __lock_acquire+0x3e5/0xb99
[<e0cef688>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x4e/0x11f [l2cap]
[<c012e7f2>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x81
[<e0cef688>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x4e/0x11f [l2cap]
[<c036ee72>] _spin_lock+0x29/0x34
[<e0cef688>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x4e/0x11f [l2cap]
[<e0cef688>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x4e/0x11f [l2cap]
[<e0ca17c3>] hci_send_cmd+0x126/0x14f [bluetooth]
[<e0ca4ce4>] hci_event_packet+0x729/0xebd [bluetooth]
[<e0ca205b>] hci_rx_task+0x2a/0x20f [bluetooth]
[<e0ca209d>] hci_rx_task+0x6c/0x20f [bluetooth]
[<c012d7be>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x10d/0x14e
[<c011ac85>] tasklet_action+0x3d/0x68
[<c011abba>] __do_softirq+0x41/0x92
[<c011ac32>] do_softirq+0x27/0x3d
[<c0105134>] do_IRQ+0x7b/0x8f
[<c0103dec>] common_interrupt+0x24/0x34
[<c0103df6>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c0248e65>] acpi_processor_idle+0x1b3/0x34a
[<c0248e68>] acpi_processor_idle+0x1b6/0x34a
[<c010232b>] cpu_idle+0x39/0x4e
[<c04bab0c>] start_kernel+0x372/0x37a
[<c04ba42b>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x202
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index f928d2b..71f5cfb 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct not
/* Detach sockets from device */
read_lock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
sk_for_each(sk, node, &hci_sk_list.head) {
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ lock_sock(sk);
if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
hci_pi(sk)->hdev = NULL;
sk->sk_err = EPIPE;
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct not
hci_dev_put(hdev);
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+ release_sock(sk);
}
read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread