public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Fabien Chevalier <fabchevalier@free.fr>
Cc: BlueZ development <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:54:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196196897.17196.56.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474AF05D.70404@free.fr>

Hi Fabien,

> > Two comments on your patch itself. The copyright on common/error.[ch] is
> > not only yours. Keep the original copyright of the files.
> 
> Well, that file didn't exit beforehand, so as far as nobody else but me 
> has touched it, what's the point in putting everybody's copyright in it?
> (OK, this is not true anymore as Johan made some changes you requested 
> to it :-) )

and the origin is from the other error.[ch] files. So the copyright
still prevails. Copying content from one file to another one doesn't
change the copyright.
 
> > It is great that you added comments for each function, but they belong
> > inside the *.c files. The rule is that they should be placed where the
> > actual function body is defined.
> 
> Marcel, i don't know where from you got this idea, but i find it pretty 
> dumb. The whole point in having the documentation in the header file is 
> that as a user of a function you're not interested in how it works (the 
> c file), but what it does, which is what the documentation is for.
> 
> I don't know of *any* project that has it's function level documentation 
> in the C files.
> But there are numerous counter-examples:
>    - The Linux Kernel (have a look at the USB stack file 
> include/linux/usb.h for instance).

And check drivers/usb/core/urb.c for another example. The documentation
comment are not for reading the *.h. They are for creating automated API
documentation. The that structs are document in the header file is
right, because they are defined there. The actual function are defined
in the *.c files and thus the comment belongs there.

Regards

Marcel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-27 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-25 21:32 [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-26  5:47 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 16:12   ` Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-27 20:54     ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2007-11-30  9:01       ` [Bluez-devel] " Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-30  9:41         ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 14:12 ` Johan Hedberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1196196897.17196.56.camel@aeonflux \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fabchevalier@free.fr \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox