* hci_read_remote_name_with_clock_offset vs hci_read_remote_name
@ 2008-09-24 9:55 Christian O. Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christian O. Andersson @ 2008-09-24 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
Hey guys,
Please bare with me as I'm just starting to learn the concepts of
hci-traffic. I hope this is the right place to ask.
I was wondering - is there any performance gain in preferring
'hci_read_remote_name_with_clock_offset' to 'hci_read_remote_name' if
you already know the clock offset (from a previous inquiry).
Looking at the source code it seems as though the latter only calls the
former with the clock offset set to 0?
/Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-09-24 9:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-24 9:55 hci_read_remote_name_with_clock_offset vs hci_read_remote_name Christian O. Andersson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox