* question on use of flags in btusb
@ 2009-05-10 8:38 Oliver Neukum
2009-05-10 15:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Neukum @ 2009-05-10 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Holtmann, linux-bluetooth
Hi,
btusb still has the BTUSB_INTR_RUNNING and BTUSB_BULK_RUNNING flags.
This seems to collide with the need to keep interrupt and bulk running.
Is this just legacy, a plan for future extensions or am I misunderstanding
things?
Regards
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: question on use of flags in btusb
2009-05-10 8:38 question on use of flags in btusb Oliver Neukum
@ 2009-05-10 15:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2009-05-10 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Neukum; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
Hi Oliver
> btusb still has the BTUSB_INTR_RUNNING and BTUSB_BULK_RUNNING flags.
> This seems to collide with the need to keep interrupt and bulk running.
> Is this just legacy, a plan for future extensions or am I misunderstanding
> things?
that is legacy. Feel free to remove them as needed.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-10 15:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-10 8:38 question on use of flags in btusb Oliver Neukum
2009-05-10 15:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox