From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@las.ic.unicamp.br>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, gustavo@padovan.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Add initial support for ERTM packets transfers
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:59:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248688751.28545.184.camel@violet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248675424-20977-2-git-send-email-gustavo@las.ic.unicamp.br>
Hi Gustavo,
> This patch adds support for ERTM transfers, without retransmission, with
> txWindow up to 63 and with acknowledgement of packets received. Now the
> packets are queued before call l2cap_do_send(), so packets couldn't be
> sent at the time we call l2cap_sock_sendmsg(). They will be sent in
> an asynchronous way on later calls of l2cap_ertm_send(). Besides if an
> error occurs on calling l2cap_do_send() we disconnect the channel.
>
> Initially based on a patch from Nathan Holstein <nathan@lampreynetworks.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <gustavo@las.ic.unicamp.br>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h | 3 +-
> include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 56 ++++++-
> net/bluetooth/l2cap.c | 340 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> index 968166a..65a5cf8 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> @@ -138,8 +138,9 @@ struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock);
> struct bt_skb_cb {
> __u8 pkt_type;
> __u8 incoming;
> + __u8 tx_seq;
> };
> -#define bt_cb(skb) ((struct bt_skb_cb *)(skb->cb))
> +#define bt_cb(skb) ((struct bt_skb_cb *)((skb)->cb))
>
> static inline struct sk_buff *bt_skb_alloc(unsigned int len, gfp_t how)
> {
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> index 6fc7698..cae561a 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MTU 672
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MIN_MTU 48
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_FLUSH_TO 0xffff
> -#define L2CAP_DEFAULT_TX_WINDOW 1
> +#define L2CAP_DEFAULT_TX_WINDOW 63
> +#define L2CAP_DEFAULT_NUM_TO_ACK (L2CAP_DEFAULT_TX_WINDOW/5)
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MAX_RECEIVE 1
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_RETRANS_TO 300 /* 300 milliseconds */
> #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MONITOR_TO 1000 /* 1 second */
> @@ -94,6 +95,33 @@ struct l2cap_conninfo {
> #define L2CAP_FCS_NONE 0x00
> #define L2CAP_FCS_CRC16 0x01
>
> +/* L2CAP Control Field bit masks */
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_SAR 0xC000
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_REQSEQ 0x3F00
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_TXSEQ 0x007E
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_RETRANS 0x0080
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_FINAL 0x0080
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_POLL 0x0010
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_SUPERVISE 0x000C
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_FRAME_TYPE 0x0001 /* I- or S-Frame */
> +
> +#define L2CAP_SEQ_NUM_INC(seq) ((seq) = (seq + 1) % 64)
the second seq needs to be (seq) too. I would also drop the L2CAP_
prefix here. And then again, why are we using this and not do it
directly in the code?
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_TXSEQ_SHIFT 1
> +#define L2CAP_CTRL_REQSEQ_SHIFT 8
> +#define L2CAP_NUM_TO_ACK_INC(seq) ((seq) = (seq + 1) % L2CAP_DEFAULT_NUM_TO_ACK)
I don't see a point in this one. It is only used once and it is more
obfuscating the code than helping it.
> +/* L2CAP Supervisory Function */
> +#define L2CAP_SUPER_RCV_READY 0x0000
> +#define L2CAP_SUPER_REJECT 0x0004
> +#define L2CAP_SUPER_RCV_NOT_READY 0x0008
> +#define L2CAP_SUPER_SELECT_REJECT 0x000C
> +
> +/* L2CAP Segmentation and Reassembly */
> +#define L2CAP_SDU_UNSEGMENTED 0x0000
> +#define L2CAP_SDU_START 0x4000
> +#define L2CAP_SDU_END 0x8000
> +#define L2CAP_SDU_CONTINUE 0xC000
> +
> /* L2CAP structures */
> struct l2cap_hdr {
> __le16 len;
> @@ -262,6 +290,7 @@ struct l2cap_conn {
>
> /* ----- L2CAP channel and socket info ----- */
> #define l2cap_pi(sk) ((struct l2cap_pinfo *) sk)
> +#define TX_QUEUE(sk) (&l2cap_pi(sk)->tx_queue)
>
> struct l2cap_pinfo {
> struct bt_sock bt;
> @@ -285,6 +314,13 @@ struct l2cap_pinfo {
> __u8 conf_len;
> __u8 conf_state;
>
> + __u8 next_tx_seq;
> + __u8 expected_ack_seq;
> + __u8 req_seq;
> + __u8 expected_tx_seq;
> + __u8 unacked_frames;
> + __u8 num_to_ack;
> +
> __u8 ident;
>
> __u8 remote_tx_win;
> @@ -295,6 +331,7 @@ struct l2cap_pinfo {
>
> __le16 sport;
>
> + struct sk_buff_head tx_queue;
> struct l2cap_conn *conn;
> struct sock *next_c;
> struct sock *prev_c;
> @@ -311,6 +348,23 @@ struct l2cap_pinfo {
> #define L2CAP_CONF_MAX_CONF_REQ 2
> #define L2CAP_CONF_MAX_CONF_RSP 2
>
> +static inline int l2cap_tx_window_full(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> + int sub;
> +
> + sub = (pi->next_tx_seq - pi->expected_ack_seq) % 64;
> +
> + if (sub < 0)
> + sub += 64;
> +
> + return (sub == pi->remote_tx_win);
> +}
> +
> +#define __get_txseq(ctrl) ((ctrl) & L2CAP_CTRL_TXSEQ) >> 1
> +#define __get_reqseq(ctrl) ((ctrl) & L2CAP_CTRL_REQSEQ) >> 8
> +#define __is_iframe(ctrl) !((ctrl) & L2CAP_CTRL_FRAME_TYPE)
> +#define __is_sframe(ctrl) (ctrl) & L2CAP_CTRL_FRAME_TYPE
>
> void l2cap_load(void);
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> index 18b3c62..b2fd4f9 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,30 @@ static inline int l2cap_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 ident, u8 code, u16
> return hci_send_acl(conn->hcon, skb, 0);
> }
>
> +static inline int l2cap_send_sframe(struct l2cap_pinfo *pi, u16 control)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
> + struct l2cap_conn *conn = pi->conn;
> + int count;
> +
> + BT_DBG("pi %p, control 0x%2.2x", pi, control);
> +
> + count = min_t(unsigned int, conn->mtu, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE + 2);
> + control |= L2CAP_CTRL_FRAME_TYPE;
> +
> + skb = bt_skb_alloc(count, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!skb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + lh = (struct l2cap_hdr *) skb_put(skb, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
> + lh->len = cpu_to_le16(2);
> + lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(pi->dcid);
> + put_unaligned_le16(control, skb_put(skb, 2));
> +
> + return hci_send_acl(pi->conn->hcon, skb, 0);
> +}
> +
> static void l2cap_do_start(struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->conn;
> @@ -1155,39 +1179,84 @@ static int l2cap_sock_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int *l
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int l2cap_do_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, int len)
> +static void l2cap_drop_acked_frames(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->conn;
> - struct sk_buff *skb, **frag;
> - int err, hlen, count, sent = 0;
> - struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> - BT_DBG("sk %p len %d", sk, len);
> + while ((skb = skb_peek(TX_QUEUE(sk)))) {
> + if (bt_cb(skb)->tx_seq == l2cap_pi(sk)->expected_ack_seq)
> + break;
>
> - /* First fragment (with L2CAP header) */
> - if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> - hlen = L2CAP_HDR_SIZE + 2;
> - else
> - hlen = L2CAP_HDR_SIZE;
> + skb = skb_dequeue(TX_QUEUE(sk));
> + kfree_skb(skb);
>
> - count = min_t(unsigned int, (conn->mtu - hlen), len);
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->unacked_frames--;
> + }
>
> - skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, hlen + count,
> - msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
> - if (!skb)
> - return err;
> + return;
> +}
>
> - /* Create L2CAP header */
> - lh = (struct l2cap_hdr *) skb_put(skb, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
> - lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(l2cap_pi(sk)->dcid);
> - lh->len = cpu_to_le16(len + (hlen - L2CAP_HDR_SIZE));
> +static inline int l2cap_do_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> + int err;
> +
> + BT_DBG("sk %p, skb %p len %d", sk, skb, skb->len);
> +
> + err = hci_send_acl(pi->conn->hcon, skb, 0);
> +
> + if (unlikely(err) < 0)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
Drop this unlikely. It is not worth it.
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int l2cap_ertm_send(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb, *tx_skb;
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> + u8 tx_seq;
> + u16 *control;
> + int err;
> +
> + while ((skb = sk->sk_send_head) && (!l2cap_tx_window_full(sk))) {
> + tx_seq = pi->next_tx_seq;
> + tx_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +
> + control = (u16 *)(skb->data + L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
> + *control |= cpu_to_le16(
> + (pi->req_seq << L2CAP_CTRL_REQSEQ_SHIFT)
> + | (tx_seq << L2CAP_CTRL_TXSEQ_SHIFT));
> +
> + err = l2cap_do_send(sk, tx_skb);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + l2cap_send_disconn_req(pi->conn, sk);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + L2CAP_SEQ_NUM_INC(pi->next_tx_seq);
> + bt_cb(skb)->tx_seq = tx_seq;
> +
> + pi->unacked_frames++;
> +
> + if (skb_queue_is_last(TX_QUEUE(sk), skb))
> + sk->sk_send_head = NULL;
> + else
> + sk->sk_send_head = skb_queue_next(TX_QUEUE(sk), skb);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> - if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> - put_unaligned(l2cap_pi(sk)->psm, (__le16 *) skb_put(skb, 2));
> +
> +static inline int l2cap_skbuff_fromiovec(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, int len, int count, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->conn;
> + struct sk_buff **frag;
> + int err, sent = 0;
>
> if (memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(skb, count), msg->msg_iov, count)) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto fail;
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> sent += count;
> @@ -1200,33 +1269,65 @@ static inline int l2cap_do_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, int len)
>
> *frag = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
> if (!*frag)
> - goto fail;
> -
> - if (memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(*frag, count), msg->msg_iov, count)) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + return -EFAULT;
> + if (memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(*frag, count), msg->msg_iov, count))
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> sent += count;
> len -= count;
>
> frag = &(*frag)->next;
> }
> - err = hci_send_acl(conn->hcon, skb, 0);
> - if (err < 0)
> - goto fail;
>
> return sent;
> +}
>
> -fail:
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - return err;
> +static struct sk_buff *l2cap_create_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, u16 *control)
Why does control have to be a pointer here. You are not modifying its
content anyway.
> +{
> + struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->conn;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + int err, count, hlen = L2CAP_HDR_SIZE;
> + struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
> +
> + BT_DBG("sk %p len %d", sk, (int)len);
> +
> + if (control)
> + hlen += 2;
> + else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> + hlen += 2;
An if (control || sk->sk_type == ...) would do the same here. I know
wanna make it the same as below, but it is confusing.
> +
> + count = min_t(unsigned int, (conn->mtu - hlen), len);
> + skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(sk, count + hlen,
> + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
> + if (!skb)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + /* Create L2CAP header */
> + lh = (struct l2cap_hdr *) skb_put(skb, L2CAP_HDR_SIZE);
> + lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(l2cap_pi(sk)->dcid);
> + lh->len = cpu_to_le16(len + (hlen - L2CAP_HDR_SIZE));
> +
> + if (control)
> + put_unaligned_le16(*control, skb_put(skb, 2));
> + else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> + put_unaligned_le16(l2cap_pi(sk)->psm, skb_put(skb, 2));
> +
> + err = l2cap_skbuff_fromiovec(sk, msg, len, count, skb);
> + if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> +
> + return skb;
> }
>
> static int l2cap_sock_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> {
> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> - int err = 0;
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + u16 control;
> + int err;
>
> BT_DBG("sock %p, sk %p", sock, sk);
>
> @@ -1238,16 +1339,61 @@ static int l2cap_sock_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct ms
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> /* Check outgoing MTU */
> - if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_RAW && len > l2cap_pi(sk)->omtu)
> + if ((sk->sk_type != SOCK_RAW || pi->mode == L2CAP_MODE_BASIC)
> + && len > pi->omtu)
> return -EINVAL;
I am confused now. Wouldn't it be better to check for == SOCK_SEQPACKET
and that it is basic mode and that the len in smaller than the MTU.
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> - if (sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECTED)
> - err = l2cap_do_send(sk, msg, len);
> - else
> + if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED) {
> err = -ENOTCONN;
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + switch (pi->mode) {
> + case L2CAP_MODE_BASIC:
> + /* Create a basic PDU */
> + skb = l2cap_create_pdu(sk, msg, len, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(skb);
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + err = l2cap_do_send(sk, skb);
> + if (!err)
> + err = len;
> + break;
> +
> + case L2CAP_MODE_ERTM:
> + /* Entire SDU fits into one PDU */
> + if (len <= pi->omtu) {
> + control = L2CAP_SDU_UNSEGMENTED;
> + skb = l2cap_create_pdu(sk, msg, len, &control);
> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(skb);
> + goto done;
> + }
> + }
> + else {
> + /* FIXME: Segmentation will be added later */
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto done;
> + }
> + __skb_queue_tail(TX_QUEUE(sk), skb);
> + if (sk->sk_send_head == NULL)
> + sk->sk_send_head = skb;
>
> + err = l2cap_ertm_send(sk);
> + if (!err)
> + err = len;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + BT_DBG("bad state %1.1x", pi->mode);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> +done:
> release_sock(sk);
> return err;
> }
> @@ -2302,6 +2448,10 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr
>
> if (l2cap_pi(sk)->conf_state & L2CAP_CONF_INPUT_DONE) {
> sk->sk_state = BT_CONNECTED;
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->next_tx_seq = 0;
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->expected_ack_seq = 0;
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->unacked_frames = 0;
> + __skb_queue_head_init(TX_QUEUE(sk));
> l2cap_chan_ready(sk);
> goto unlock;
> }
> @@ -2376,6 +2526,9 @@ static inline int l2cap_config_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hdr
>
> if (l2cap_pi(sk)->conf_state & L2CAP_CONF_OUTPUT_DONE) {
> sk->sk_state = BT_CONNECTED;
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->expected_tx_seq = 0;
> + l2cap_pi(sk)->num_to_ack = 0;
> + __skb_queue_head_init(TX_QUEUE(sk));
> l2cap_chan_ready(sk);
> }
>
> @@ -2406,6 +2559,8 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd
>
> sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
>
> + skb_queue_purge(TX_QUEUE(sk));
> +
> l2cap_chan_del(sk, ECONNRESET);
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
>
> @@ -2428,6 +2583,8 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd
> if (!sk)
> return 0;
>
> + skb_queue_purge(TX_QUEUE(sk));
> +
> l2cap_chan_del(sk, 0);
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
>
> @@ -2603,9 +2760,63 @@ static inline void l2cap_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *sk
> kfree_skb(skb);
> }
>
> +static inline int l2cap_data_channel_iframe(struct sock *sk, u16 rx_control, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> + u8 tx_seq = __get_txseq(rx_control);
> + u16 tx_control = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + BT_DBG("sk %p rx_control 0x%4.4x len %d", sk, rx_control, skb->len);
> +
> + if (tx_seq != pi->expected_tx_seq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + L2CAP_SEQ_NUM_INC(pi->expected_tx_seq);
> + err = sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + L2CAP_NUM_TO_ACK_INC(pi->num_to_ack);
> + if (pi->num_to_ack == L2CAP_DEFAULT_NUM_TO_ACK - 1) {
> + tx_control |= L2CAP_CTRL_FRAME_TYPE;
> + tx_control |= L2CAP_SUPER_RCV_READY;
> + tx_control |= pi->expected_tx_seq << L2CAP_CTRL_REQSEQ_SHIFT;
> +
> + err = l2cap_send_sframe(pi, tx_control);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + return err;
Drop this unlikely, too. Just return err. Actually at this point in the
flow there is no need to check it at all.
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int l2cap_data_channel_sframe(struct sock *sk, u16 rx_control, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
> +
> + BT_DBG("sk %p rx_control 0x%4.4x len %d", sk, rx_control, skb->len);
> +
> + switch (rx_control & L2CAP_CTRL_SUPERVISE) {
> + case L2CAP_SUPER_RCV_READY:
> + pi->expected_ack_seq = __get_reqseq(rx_control);
> + l2cap_drop_acked_frames(sk);
> + l2cap_ertm_send(sk);
> + break;
> +
> + case L2CAP_SUPER_RCV_NOT_READY:
> + case L2CAP_SUPER_REJECT:
> + case L2CAP_SUPER_SELECT_REJECT:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int l2cap_data_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u16 cid, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sock *sk;
> + u16 control;
> + int err;
>
> sk = l2cap_get_chan_by_scid(&conn->chan_list, cid);
> if (!sk) {
> @@ -2618,16 +2829,40 @@ static inline int l2cap_data_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u16 cid, struct sk
> if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED)
> goto drop;
>
> - if (l2cap_pi(sk)->imtu < skb->len)
> - goto drop;
> + switch (l2cap_pi(sk)->mode) {
> + case L2CAP_MODE_BASIC:
> + /* If socket recv buffers overflows we drop data here
> + * which is *bad* because L2CAP has to be reliable.
> + * But we don't have any other choice. L2CAP doesn't
> + * provide flow control mechanism. */
>
> - /* If socket recv buffers overflows we drop data here
> - * which is *bad* because L2CAP has to be reliable.
> - * But we don't have any other choice. L2CAP doesn't
> - * provide flow control mechanism. */
> + if (l2cap_pi(sk)->imtu < skb->len)
> + goto drop;
>
> - if (!sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb))
> - goto done;
> + if (!sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb))
> + goto done;
> + break;
> +
> + case L2CAP_MODE_ERTM:
> + control = get_unaligned_le16(skb->data);
> + skb_pull(skb, 2);
> +
> + if (l2cap_pi(sk)->imtu < skb->len)
> + goto drop;
> +
> + if (__is_iframe(control))
> + err = l2cap_data_channel_iframe(sk, control, skb);
> + else
> + err = l2cap_data_channel_sframe(sk, control, skb);
> +
> + if (!err)
> + goto done;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + BT_DBG("sk %p: bad mode 0x%2.2x", sk, l2cap_pi(sk)->mode);
> + break;
> + }
>
> drop:
> kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -2677,6 +2912,9 @@ static void l2cap_recv_frame(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> cid = __le16_to_cpu(lh->cid);
> len = __le16_to_cpu(lh->len);
>
> + if (len != skb->len)
> + goto drop;
> +
> BT_DBG("len %d, cid 0x%4.4x", len, cid);
>
> switch (cid) {
> @@ -2694,6 +2932,10 @@ static void l2cap_recv_frame(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> l2cap_data_channel(conn, cid, skb);
> break;
> }
> + return;
> +
> +drop:
> + kfree_skb(skb);
So this change is pointless. Just free the skb and return from the
actual length check. There is no benefit to go to the end of the
function here.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 6:17 [PATCH 0/4] Bluetooth: Patch set for ERTM Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Add initial support for ERTM packets transfers Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 6:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: Add support for Segmentation and Reassembly of SDUs Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 6:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] Bluetooth: Initial support for retransmission of packets with REJ frames Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 6:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] Bluetooth: Add support for Retransmission and Monitor Timers Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 10:08 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-27 10:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] Bluetooth: Initial support for retransmission of packets with REJ frames Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-27 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: Add support for Segmentation and Reassembly of SDUs Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-28 11:30 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2009-07-27 9:59 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-07-28 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Add initial support for ERTM packets transfers Gustavo F. Padovan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-31 22:57 Gustavo F. Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248688751.28545.184.camel@violet \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=gustavo@las.ic.unicamp.br \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox