From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Suraj <suraj@Atheros.com>
Cc: Suraj Sumangala <Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
Jothikumar Mothilal <Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Provide access to reassembled Rx packets
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:14:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280207657.2621.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4E650D.4080806@Atheros.com>
Hi Suraj,
> > So first of all, lets make something perfectly clear. All Bluetooth
> > drivers are _transport_ drivers. They don't need to know what they are
> > transporting. And in addition you should not look into the packets that
> > you are sending or receiving. The Bluetooth core does that HCI packet
> > parsing.
> >
> > This is how I want it and how this is going to stay. Everything else is
> > an insane approach and cost every single driver overhead. In addition
> > the lifetime rules of SKBs become more and more complicated. That is a
> > pretty bad thing. It will result in excessive memory usage and will
> > cause problems.
>
> I understand the point that you are making. But If I am not mistaken,
> HCI transport driver is the only part of the system that could be vendor
> specific ( HCI ATH3K, HCI LL etc). So a vendor specific command or event
> makes more sense to a transport driver than anybody else.
>
> Is there anyway this requirement can be sufficed without causing the
> issues you have mentioned above?
so you might be able to convince me if you implement something proper
for handling vendor commands. The basic assumption is still that a HCI
driver is a pure transport driver.
However you have access to hci_dev. So if you create some functions to
execute vendor commands and retrieve the results then this might be a
way. The core already processes vendor commands and events. But keep in
mind that there is no requirement to get a command status or command
complete event for vendor commands. For example CSR doesn't send them
for their vendor commands.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 6:34 [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Provide access to reassembled Rx packets Suraj Sumangala
2010-07-26 15:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-07-26 18:23 ` Suraj
2010-07-26 22:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-07-27 2:23 ` Suraj
2010-07-27 4:48 ` Suraj
2010-07-27 5:14 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2010-07-27 15:36 ` Suraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280207657.2621.74.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com \
--cc=Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suraj@Atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox