* Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
@ 2014-02-09 8:53 Pacho Ramos
2014-02-10 13:40 ` Bastien Nocera
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2014-02-09 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BlueZ development
Hello
I was looking at bluez package and found some patches that maybe could
be upstreamed. Also, I would like to know the reasons for not accepting
them to ensure they are safe to be applied downstream by us too :)
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-Allow-using-obexd-without-systemd-in-the-user-sessio.patch -> Does this cause any issues with systemd --user setups?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-obex-Use-GLib-helper-function-to-manipulate-paths.patch
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0002-autopair-Don-t-handle-the-iCade.patch
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch
-> Any reason for not applying it upstream too?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-work-around-Logitech-diNovo-Edge-keyboard-firmware-i.patch
-> Taking care this looks to be a really old issue, maybe using the
workaround would be the only option for now :/
Thanks a lot for your thoughts :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
2014-02-09 8:53 Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream Pacho Ramos
@ 2014-02-10 13:40 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-02-10 20:01 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bastien Nocera @ 2014-02-10 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pacho Ramos; +Cc: BlueZ development
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 09:53 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I was looking at bluez package and found some patches that maybe could
> be upstreamed. Also, I would like to know the reasons for not accepting
> them to ensure they are safe to be applied downstream by us too :)
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-Allow-using-obexd-without-systemd-in-the-user-sessio.patch -> Does this cause any issues with systemd --user setups?
Giovanni already posted this patch earlier. There's no distribution
using systemd sessions, so this doesn't work yet.
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-obex-Use-GLib-helper-function-to-manipulate-paths.patch
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0002-autopair-Don-t-handle-the-iCade.patch
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch
> -> Any reason for not applying it upstream too?
I've posted those patches to the list as well.
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-work-around-Logitech-diNovo-Edge-keyboard-firmware-i.patch
> -> Taking care this looks to be a really old issue, maybe using the
> workaround would be the only option for now :/
I have no hardware to test this on, I snatched it from Ubuntu's bluez 4
package.
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
2014-02-10 13:40 ` Bastien Nocera
@ 2014-02-10 20:01 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-02-11 13:27 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-02-16 18:58 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2014-02-10 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bastien Nocera; +Cc: BlueZ development
El lun, 10-02-2014 a las 14:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera escribió:
> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 09:53 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I was looking at bluez package and found some patches that maybe could
> > be upstreamed. Also, I would like to know the reasons for not accepting
> > them to ensure they are safe to be applied downstream by us too :)
> >
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-Allow-using-obexd-without-systemd-in-the-user-sessio.patch -> Does this cause any issues with systemd --user setups?
>
> Giovanni already posted this patch earlier. There's no distribution
> using systemd sessions, so this doesn't work yet.
>
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-obex-Use-GLib-helper-function-to-manipulate-paths.patch
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0002-autopair-Don-t-handle-the-iCade.patch
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch
> > -> Any reason for not applying it upstream too?
>
> I've posted those patches to the list as well.
And, do you know why they weren't accepted? (it's for trying to get them
merged and not needing to carry them forever)
>
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-work-around-Logitech-diNovo-Edge-keyboard-firmware-i.patch
> > -> Taking care this looks to be a really old issue, maybe using the
> > workaround would be the only option for now :/
>
> I have no hardware to test this on, I snatched it from Ubuntu's bluez 4
> package.
>
> Cheers
OK, thanks :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
2014-02-10 20:01 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2014-02-11 13:27 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-02-16 19:06 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-02-16 18:58 ` Pacho Ramos
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bastien Nocera @ 2014-02-11 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pacho Ramos; +Cc: BlueZ development
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 21:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 10-02-2014 a las 14:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera escribió:
> > On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 09:53 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I was looking at bluez package and found some patches that maybe could
> > > be upstreamed. Also, I would like to know the reasons for not accepting
> > > them to ensure they are safe to be applied downstream by us too :)
> > >
> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-Allow-using-obexd-without-systemd-in-the-user-sessio.patch -> Does this cause any issues with systemd --user setups?
> >
> > Giovanni already posted this patch earlier. There's no distribution
> > using systemd sessions, so this doesn't work yet.
> >
> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-obex-Use-GLib-helper-function-to-manipulate-paths.patch
> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0002-autopair-Don-t-handle-the-iCade.patch
> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch
> > > -> Any reason for not applying it upstream too?
> >
> > I've posted those patches to the list as well.
>
> And, do you know why they weren't accepted? (it's for trying to get them
> merged and not needing to carry them forever)
Read the threads for the various patches?
Mailing-lists, awful at tracking patches since forever...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
2014-02-11 13:27 ` Bastien Nocera
@ 2014-02-16 19:06 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2014-02-16 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bastien Nocera; +Cc: BlueZ development
El mar, 11-02-2014 a las 14:27 +0100, Bastien Nocera escribió:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 21:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El lun, 10-02-2014 a las 14:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera escribió:
> > > On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 09:53 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > I was looking at bluez package and found some patches that maybe could
> > > > be upstreamed. Also, I would like to know the reasons for not accepting
> > > > them to ensure they are safe to be applied downstream by us too :)
> > > >
> > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-Allow-using-obexd-without-systemd-in-the-user-sessio.patch -> Does this cause any issues with systemd --user setups?
> > >
> > > Giovanni already posted this patch earlier. There's no distribution
> > > using systemd sessions, so this doesn't work yet.
> > >
> > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-obex-Use-GLib-helper-function-to-manipulate-paths.patch
> > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0002-autopair-Don-t-handle-the-iCade.patch
> > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch
> > > > -> Any reason for not applying it upstream too?
> > >
> > > I've posted those patches to the list as well.
> >
> > And, do you know why they weren't accepted? (it's for trying to get them
> > merged and not needing to carry them forever)
>
> Read the threads for the various patches?
>
> Mailing-lists, awful at tracking patches since forever...
>
But, for example for the patch allowing to run without systemd --user:
http://marc.info/?t=138159296100001&r=1&w=2
What is the point in providing a "--disable-systemd" configure flag that
needs this patches to be applied to be really working? Looks like
"--enable-systemd" will be needed if we don't apply that patches
downstream...
Also:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg40136.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg41264.html
Look to have no reply at all
And for 0004-agent-Assert-possible-infinite-loop.patch I can't find the
relevant thread :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream
2014-02-10 20:01 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-02-11 13:27 ` Bastien Nocera
@ 2014-02-16 18:58 ` Pacho Ramos
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2014-02-16 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bastien Nocera; +Cc: BlueZ development
El lun, 10-02-2014 a las 21:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> [...]
> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/tree/0001-work-around-Logitech-diNovo-Edge-keyboard-firmware-i.patch
> > > -> Taking care this looks to be a really old issue, maybe using the
> > > workaround would be the only option for now :/
> >
> > I have no hardware to test this on, I snatched it from Ubuntu's bluez 4
> > package.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> OK, thanks :)
>
Looks to be still needed:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501120
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-16 19:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-09 8:53 Some patches applied on Fedora that maybe should be considered for being applied upstream Pacho Ramos
2014-02-10 13:40 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-02-10 20:01 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-02-11 13:27 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-02-16 19:06 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-02-16 18:58 ` Pacho Ramos
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox