From: Sergey Lebedev <lsa.uz@pm.me>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: "Vladimir V . Kondratyev" <vladimirkondratyev2@gmail.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Chandrashekar Devegowda <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>,
Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: fix stale cache in set_dxstate fallback check
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:24:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902072417.30260-1-lsa.uz@pm.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d633b7ee-0afa-4fa1-8340-3d7616f429d2@molgen.mpg.de>
Paul,
Two of your three points I can answer from the hardware, since the
Tested-by on this patch is mine.
> Can you reproduce this on real hardware?
Yes. Surface Pro 11 (Intel, Lunar Lake), Intel BE201, 8086:a876 rev 10.
It first appeared in ordinary use, not in a test:
Bluetooth: hci0: Timeout (200 ms) on alive interrupt for D2 entry, retry count 0
Bluetooth: hci0: Timeout (200 ms) on alive interrupt for D2 entry, retry count 1
Bluetooth: hci0: Timeout (200 ms) on alive interrupt for D2 entry, retry count 2
btintel_pcie 0000:00:14.7: PM: pci_pm_suspend(): btintel_pcie_suspend returns -16
PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
One device returning -EBUSY aborts the whole system suspend, so the
machine does not sleep at all.
I have to be honest about the rate rather than useful: it failed on 2 of
the 3 suspends I attempted before installing a workaround, and later, on
a newer kernel with the workaround removed, it succeeded 7 times out of 7
with no btintel_pcie change in between. So the spontaneous failure is not
something I can produce on demand.
What I could do was exercise the exact path deterministically. I built
the driver out of tree with one debug-only parameter that returns from
btintel_pcie_msix_gp0_handler() before the boot_stage_cache refresh, and
only while alive_intr_ctxt is BTINTEL_PCIE_D0. That leaves the cache
stale and gp0_received false — precisely the state a genuinely missed
alive interrupt leaves behind — while the controller still reaches D3.
Without the patch, that reproduces the production failure exactly: three
timeouts, -EBUSY, suspend aborted. With the patch and nothing else
changed: one timeout, the re-read observes D3, set_dxstate() returns 0,
and the system suspends and resumes normally.
Full method and logs are in my earlier message on this thread,
Message-ID <20260830151550.44687-1-lsa.uz@pm.me>.
> To me it sounds strange, that a register name *boot stage* should
> change after the boot. ;-)
It is a fair reaction to the name, but the register genuinely carries
live power state. From the driver's own header:
#define BTINTEL_PCIE_CSR_BOOT_STAGE_D3_STATE_READY (BIT(24))
and both helpers test that one bit and nothing else:
static bool btintel_pcie_in_d3(struct btintel_pcie_data *data)
{
return data->boot_stage_cache & BTINTEL_PCIE_CSR_BOOT_STAGE_D3_STATE_READY;
}
static bool btintel_pcie_in_d0(struct btintel_pcie_data *data)
{
return !(data->boot_stage_cache & BTINTEL_PCIE_CSR_BOOT_STAGE_D3_STATE_READY);
}
So bit 24 is updated by the controller on every D-state transition, long
after boot. The name describes the register's original purpose rather
than everything Intel later put in it. btintel_pcie_resume() already
re-reads it for exactly this reason, which is what makes the patch's
change consistent rather than novel.
The re-flow is Vladimir's call and I have no opinion on it. If a v3 comes
out of this, I still have the hardware and the test fixture and will
re-run both halves against it.
Thanks,
Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 20:34 [PATCH] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: fix stale cache in set_dxstate fallback check Vladimir V. Kondratyev
2026-05-07 21:06 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-09-01 20:37 ` [PATCH] " Vladimir V. Kondratyev
2026-09-01 22:36 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-09-02 5:35 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2026-09-02 7:24 ` Sergey Lebedev [this message]
2026-09-02 8:38 ` Paul Menzel
2026-09-02 9:30 ` Sergey Lebedev
2026-09-03 14:29 ` [PATCH v3] " Vladimir V. Kondratyev
2026-09-03 14:36 ` Paul Menzel
2026-09-03 14:47 ` [v3] " bluez.test.bot
2026-09-03 15:35 ` [PATCH v3] " Vladimir V. Kondratyev
2026-09-03 17:20 ` Sergey Lebedev
2026-09-03 18:40 ` [v3] " bluez.test.bot
2026-09-03 20:19 ` Paul Menzel
2026-09-03 19:22 ` [PATCH v4] " Vladimir V. Kondratyev
2026-09-03 19:53 ` Sergey Lebedev
2026-09-03 21:25 ` [v4] " bluez.test.bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-30 15:15 [PATCH] " Sergey Lebedev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902072417.30260-1-lsa.uz@pm.me \
--to=lsa.uz@pm.me \
--cc=chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com \
--cc=kiran.k@intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=vladimirkondratyev2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox