* clock offset
@ 2009-01-08 1:43 David Thornton
2009-01-18 15:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Thornton @ 2009-01-08 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
Hello,
I know this is a general question, not related to bluez (but to
blutooth) and if I should post it here, please - shout me down.
its about the clock offset field in an HCI packet that queries another
device. If i set the valid flag to 0, does that mean it disregards the
clock offset - and i could set the whole field to zero?
I dont want it to be light speed and optimized, just work (for now...)
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: clock offset
2009-01-08 1:43 clock offset David Thornton
@ 2009-01-18 15:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2009-01-18 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Thornton; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
Hi David,
> I know this is a general question, not related to bluez (but to
> blutooth) and if I should post it here, please - shout me down.
>
> its about the clock offset field in an HCI packet that queries another
> device. If i set the valid flag to 0, does that mean it disregards the
> clock offset - and i could set the whole field to zero?
>
> I dont want it to be light speed and optimized, just work (for now...)
simple answer is yes. However some chips optimize this by themself in
the link manager anyway.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-18 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-08 1:43 clock offset David Thornton
2009-01-18 15:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox