From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Daryl Van Vorst <daryl@wideray.com>,
"'BlueZ Mailing List'" <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:05:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030513165931.0d377d88@unixmail.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1052867997.4608.23.camel@pegasus.local>
At 04:19 PM 5/13/2003, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>so if we detect a failure in an ACL packet, we notify all L2CAP
>connections on the ACL link that have this option set. This sounds a
>little bit better to me. I understand you wrong at the first time and
>now I think we should have such extra stuff.
>
>But I don't like the name and your meaning of this options. It sounds
>like something that it is not and will never be. For the description of
>this option I think it should be something like
>
> "Notify me when you detect an error in the ACL payload"
ACL is a lower lever. If baseband detects error in ACL payload it retransmits
a packet :).
>And the option name can be L2CAP_CHECKACL. This is not very good, I
>know, so any other proposals?
L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE
Implementation is very very very simple and code for 2.4 is already in BK :).
http://linux-bt.bkbits.net:8080/bt-2.4/patch@1.1163?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-1h|cset@1.1163
We didn't even need a new socket option. Just another LM (link mode) flag. And common case
is not affected at all.
Now we just need to add support for it in l2test.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-14 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-06 17:34 [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-07 10:56 ` Stephen Crane
2003-05-07 16:44 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-08 2:18 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-12 16:37 ` Stephen Crane
2003-05-12 19:38 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-08 13:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-08 18:11 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-08 19:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-08 21:04 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-08 21:55 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-09 0:10 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-08 22:06 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-08 18:33 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-09 0:51 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-09 1:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-09 18:11 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-09 18:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-09 21:15 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-09 21:52 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-09 22:51 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-09 23:16 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-09 23:40 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-10 0:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-10 2:33 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-10 6:17 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-10 11:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-11 3:57 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-12 22:51 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-12 23:05 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-13 17:37 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-13 17:55 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-13 22:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-13 23:02 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-13 23:19 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-14 0:05 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2003-05-14 0:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-14 16:02 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-14 16:34 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-14 21:12 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-14 22:24 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-14 22:27 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-14 22:35 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-16 0:43 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-16 14:43 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-16 17:38 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-16 17:54 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-16 7:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-10 6:16 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-10 16:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-11 7:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-11 7:44 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-12 23:37 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-13 0:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-13 0:43 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-13 17:49 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-13 17:44 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-13 18:36 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-15 21:25 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-16 17:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-16 18:01 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-16 18:23 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-05-19 21:17 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-19 21:19 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-20 16:40 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-29 22:51 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-06-12 18:08 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-06-12 18:49 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-06-12 19:11 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-06-12 20:54 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-06-12 21:28 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-06-13 1:22 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-05-13 13:30 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-05-13 14:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-01 0:32 [Bluez-devel] Qualification testing Daryl Van Vorst
2004-12-01 6:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-01 19:09 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-12-01 19:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-01 23:02 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-12-02 7:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-02 17:56 ` Daryl Van Vorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.1.0.14.2.20030513165931.0d377d88@unixmail.qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=daryl@wideray.com \
--cc=marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox