Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: RE: Support for block device NVMEM providers
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a2c32c7.4a342cbc.316e90.3f1e@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612-block-as-nvmem-v5-1-95e0b30fff90@oss.qualcomm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4924 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=1110666

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      6.99 seconds
VerifyFixes                   PASS      0.08 seconds
VerifySignedoff               PASS      0.09 seconds
GitLint                       FAIL      2.10 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.68 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      25.13 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      28.06 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      26.89 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      24.22 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      522.99 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       FAIL      57.69 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      82.59 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      19.28 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        FAIL      207.46 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      24.85 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      31.83 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      25.95 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        FAIL      25.88 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      22.98 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      20.31 seconds
TestRunner_6lowpan-tester     FAIL      45.85 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      67.81 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script
Output:
[v5,5/9] block: implement NVMEM provider
WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol with at least 4 lines
#209: FILE: block/Kconfig:212:
+config BLK_NVMEM
+	bool "Block device NVMEM provider"
+	depends on OF
+	depends on NVMEM
+	help
+	  Allow block devices (or partitions) to act as NVMEM providers,
+	  typically used with eMMC to store MAC addresses or Wi-Fi
+	  calibration data on embedded devices.
+

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#231: 
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 172 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

/github/workspace/src/patch/14626125.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


##############################
Test: GitLint - FAIL
Desc: Run gitlint
Output:
[v5,9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses

1: T1 Title exceeds max length (85>80): "[v5,9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses"
##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL
Desc: Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
Output:
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
"Bluetooth: " prefix is not specified in the subject
##############################
Test: TestRunner_l2cap-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run l2cap-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 96, Passed: 95 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
L2CAP BR/EDR Server - Set PHY 1M                     Failed       0.249 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 494, Passed: 489 (99.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 4

Failed Test Cases
Read Exp Feature - Success                           Failed       0.236 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mesh-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mesh-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 10, Passed: 8 (80.0%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Mesh - Send cancel - 1                               Timed out    2.479 seconds
Mesh - Send cancel - 2                               Timed out    1.988 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner_6lowpan-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run 6lowpan-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 8, Passed: 3 (37.5%), Failed: 5, Not Run: 0

Failed Test Cases
Client Connect - Disconnect                          Timed out    5.433 seconds
Client Recv Dgram - Success                          Timed out    4.987 seconds
Client Recv Raw - Success                            Timed out    4.992 seconds
Client Recv IPHC Dgram - Success                     Timed out    4.997 seconds
Client Recv IPHC Raw - Success                       Timed out    4.998 seconds


https://github.com/bluez/bluetooth-next/pull/307

---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 13:20 [PATCH v5 0/9] Support for block device NVMEM providers Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] block: partitions: of: Skip child nodes without reg property Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 16:24   ` bluez.test.bot [this message]
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] dt-bindings: net: wireless: qcom,ath10k: Document NVMEM cells Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] dt-bindings: bluetooth: qcom: Add NVMEM BD address cell Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] block: implement NVMEM provider Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] net: of_net: Add of_get_nvmem_eui48() helper for EUI-48 lookup Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Add NVMEM-backed BD address retrieval Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] Bluetooth: qca: Set NVMEM BD address quirks when address is invalid Loic Poulain
2026-06-12 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: arduino-imola: Describe NVMEM layout for WiFi/BT addresses Loic Poulain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-09  7:52 [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-06-09  9:31 ` Support for block device NVMEM providers bluez.test.bot
2026-06-08 10:50 [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-06-08 12:12 ` Support for block device NVMEM providers bluez.test.bot
2026-05-07 15:24 [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-05-07 16:19 ` Support for block device NVMEM providers bluez.test.bot
2026-04-28 14:23 [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: mmc: Document support for nvmem-layout Loic Poulain
2026-04-28 17:44 ` Support for block device NVMEM providers bluez.test.bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a2c32c7.4a342cbc.316e90.3f1e@mx.google.com \
    --to=bluez.test.bot@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox