From: "jaikumar Ganesh" <jaikumarg@gmail.com>
To: "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: "Nick Pelly" <npelly@google.com>,
"Ville Tervo" <ville.tervo@nokia.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, johan.hedberg@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Some kernel changes
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:13:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac290f760901151113jfd2d3b2t8bce890dd186ecbd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231873966.12234.2.camel@californication>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2772 bytes --]
Hi Marcel,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> > >> Here is set of unclean patches for discussion. These are still
> untested
> > >> and contain issues, but I would like to know if we should continue
> with
> > >> these or change something radically. Also commit messages are somewhat
> > >> misleading in some places.
> > >>
> > >> Basically idea is to implement connection rejection support for l2cap
> > >> and rfcomm sockets. IOW possibility to check initiator bd-address and
> > >> ask for authorization before accepting connection.
> > >>
> > >> Other goal is to fix encryption and authentication levels to fulfill
> 2.1
> > >> requirements.
> > >
> > > so I pushed my re-worked and pending patches to bluetooth-testing.git
> > > now. This adds support for BT_DEFER_SETUP and BT_SECURITY (only the
> > > logic and not the actual socket option).
> >
> > Ville: thanks for the patches, pausing RFCOMM while encryption is
> > disabled is a nice fix.
> >
> > I imagine that if encryption is not quickly re-established we need to
> > drop the RFCOMM link rather than leaving it paused though.
> >
> > We will do some testing of the current rfcomm-pause patches.
>
> so I pushed another set of patches to the bluetooth-testing.git tree and
> it should include the full BT_SECURITY implemention, BT_DEFER_SETUP for
> RFCOMM and SCO rejection if no listen socket is present.
>
> It currently only drops the connection is encryption is disabled when
> using BT_SECURITY_HIGH. That is only used for SAP anyway. For all other
> profiles we use BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM.
I updated our build with the patches and after picking up 6e26576c
(Pause RFCOMM TX when encryption drops) and fixes upto f32ef1836 (Enforce
authentication before encryption) I see a couple of problems::
a) I see that in rfcomm/core.c in function rfcomm_security_cfm: when
the remote side has dropped the encryption for the role change, we set the
RFCOMM_SEC_PENDING bit but we don't set RFCOMM_AUTH_PENDING as suggested in
Ville's original patch and so when encryption is re-established we dont get
past the - test_and_clear_bit (RFCOMM_AUTH_PENDING) check in the function.
b) I also see that we are not clearing the timer and hence after
RFCOMM_AUTH_TIMEOUT period expires we bring down the RFCOMM connection even
though the encryption has been established.
Sorry, I don't have a patch ready as yet and hence the description above
to check if you have encountered the same.
Thanks
Jaikumar
>
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3754 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-15 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 12:33 [RFC] Some kernel changes Ville Tervo
2009-01-10 14:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-10 14:26 ` Johan Hedberg
2009-01-12 13:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-12 17:15 ` Nick Pelly
2009-01-13 19:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 19:13 ` jaikumar Ganesh [this message]
2009-01-15 23:25 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 23:52 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-16 9:47 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-20 18:54 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-20 20:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-21 0:28 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-21 11:19 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-21 17:46 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-28 9:27 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-28 9:59 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-28 10:18 ` jaikumar Ganesh
2009-01-28 10:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-15 19:14 ` jaikumar Ganesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac290f760901151113jfd2d3b2t8bce890dd186ecbd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaikumarg@gmail.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=npelly@google.com \
--cc=ville.tervo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox